Defendant's claim that voice identification evidence should have been precluded for lack of notice required by CPL 710.30(1)(b) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that although the notice should have been given (see People v. Collins, 60 N.Y.2d 214), the error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt (see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.