Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HIAWATHA QUAINTANCE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse Appellant's conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine and remand for a new trial. Appellant was tried for possession of cocaine on January 13, 2002. For any offense occurring prior to May 13, 2002, an essential element of the crime of possession of an illegal substance was knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance.

At trial, Appellant testified and denied possession of any drugs or knowledge that cocaine was present. This denial placed at issue all elements of the offense, including knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance. Failure to instruct the jury on the element of knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance in his possession was reversible error. See Goodman v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D733 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 13, 2003); Scott v. State, 808 So.2d 166 (Fla. 2002); Chicone v. State, 684 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1996) .

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, LEWIS, and HAWKES, J.J., CONCUR

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

QUAINTANCE v. STATE
(May 15, 2003)