DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his objections to the order temporarily reducing his child support obligation ( see Friedman v. Friedman, 309 A.D.2d 830; Matter of Musumeci v. Musumeci, 295 A.D.2d 516; Matter of Heverin v. Sackel, 239 A.D.2d 418; Matter of Yepes v. Fichera, 230 A.D.2d 803; Matter of Johnson v. Johnson, 55 A.D.2d 605).
The appellant's remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached light of our determination.
FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.