Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 1:04-CV-147. Motions Motion for summary judgment : In Part Judges Harry Sandlin Mattice See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. OPINION WILLIAM BOLES, Plaintiff, v. POLYLOOM CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM HARRY MATTICE JR., District Judge Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Polyloom Corporation of America ("Polyloom"). Plaintiff William Boles brought this action against Polyloom, his former employer, challenging his termination and certain other aspects of his treatment while an employee of Polyloom. He asserts claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"), and the Employment Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). For the reasons set forth below, Polyloom's Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Summary judgment is proper where "the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the Court must view the facts contained in the record and all inferences that can be drawn from