Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEPH v. UNITED STATES.

Miscellaneous Orders

C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Statement of JUSTICE STEVENS respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.

In Dickerson v. United States, 530 U. S. 428 (2000), we held that the first sentence of 18 U.S.C. § 3501(a) is unconstitutional. In this case the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's rejection of the petitioner's request for an instruction relating to the voluntariness of her confession — an instruction that the third sentence of § 3501(a) requires. The Court of Appeals reasoned that Dickerson had invalidated all of § 3501 and not just the first sentence. As the Solicitor General concedes, that holding was erroneous. While I am persuaded that the arguably harmless character of the trial judge's error provides a proper reason for denying the petition for certiorari, I think it important to note that our denial does not endorse the incorrect reasoning in the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOSEPH v. U.S
(Jan 16, 2007)