Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

THOMAS STRBAC, Petitioner, v. THOMAS R. SNIEZEK, WARDEN, Respondent.

ORDER

ANN ALDRICH, Senior District Judge

On September 25, 2006, Petitioner Thomas Strbac ("Strbac") filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, alleging that the Bureau of Prisons improperly failed to credit him with four months towards the completion of his sixteen-month sentence. This court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Nancy A. Vecchiarelli for preparation of a Report and Recommendation ("R R"). On December 12, 2006, Thomas Sniezek ("Sniezek") filed a motion to dismiss the case. (Doc. No. 8.) Both parties filed briefs in support of their respective positions. Judge Vecchiarelli then submitted her R R on January 8, 2007, recommending that the court grant Sniezek's motion. Strbac filed objections to the R R on January 12, 2007. (Doc. No. 15.)

The court finds, after careful de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's R R and all other relevant documents, that the Magistrate Judge's conclusions are fully supported by the record and controlling case law. Accordingly, the court adopts as its own the Magistrate Judge's R R. (Doc. No. 13.) Sniezek's motion to dismiss is hereby granted with prejudice. The court further certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STRBAC v. SNIEZEK
(May 24, 2007)