Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The hearing officer's determination that the petitioner used a controlled substance, thus violating disciplinary rule 113.24 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xiv]) was supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Smythe v Goord, 41 AD3d 608, 609). During the hearing held on September 30, 2005 and October 16, 17, and 18, 2005, the hearing officer considered, inter alia, a misbehavior report and two urinalysis reports which indicated that the petitioner tested positive for opiates and cannabinoids ( id; see Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 138; see also Matter of Thompson v Goord, 37 AD3d 914), as well as the testimony of two corrections officers, one of whom had tested the urine sample provided by the petitioner.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.