AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL SAITTA, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Defendants. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Defendants. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents,

It should have been apparent to Allianz that all of the information it needed to issue a denial of coverage was contained in the enclosures forwarded by the Transit Authority along with its notice of the accident, including that the Transit Authority's claim arose out of the work of Allianz's named insured, that the injured person was an employee of the named insured, and that the Transit Authority's notice of the accident was untimely. Accordingly, Allianz's nearly four-month delay in disclaiming coverage, measured from its receipt of the Transit Authority's notice of the accident, was unreasonable as a matter of law, absent a reasonable explanation for the delay ( see First Fin. Ins. Co. v Jetco Contr. Corp., 1 NY3d 64, 68-69, 70). It does not avail Allianz to argue that it was not required to limit its investigation to the Transit Authority's delay, where its claims examiner could not say, at her deposition, what other grounds for denying coverage were investigated.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAITTA v. N.Y. CITY TRANSIT AUTH
(Oct 23, 2008)