AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

EDDIE MILTON GAREY, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL G. THOMPSON, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

HUGH LAWSON, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Doc. 17) of the Magistrate Judge. The R R recommends dismissing, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), pro se Plaintiff's § 1983 Complaint (Doc. 1) on the grounds that the Complaint is frivolous and fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. After the Magistrate Judge issued his R R, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. 26). Because an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint, Pintando v. Miami-Dade Housing Agency, 501 F.3d 1241, 1243 (11th Cir. 2007), the R R recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's original Complaint is moot. As a result, the Court declines to adopt the R R.

This statute provides that when a plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the district court must dismiss the plaintiff's case at any time if, among other things, the plaintiff's case is (1) frivolous or malicious, (2) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Magistrate Judge screened the Complaint in accordance with this statute.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GAREY v. THOMPSON
(Jan 28, 2009)