AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

DAVID F. SPRINKLE, Plaintiff, v. EARL BARKSDALE, ET AL., Defendants.

ORDER

GLEN CONRAD, District Judge

In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED

as follows:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

2. Defendant DiGiovanni's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 45) is GRANTED;

3. The motion to dismiss filed by the other medical defendants (Dkt. No. 53) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is GRANTED as to Defendants Elko, Driskoll, and Sams, but is DENIED as to Defendants Cypress and Downs with regard to plaintiff's claims, as outlined in the memorandum opinion, that these defendants acted with deliberate indifferent to his serious medical need for pain medication. These defendants are directed to file an answer and any other dispositive motion within twenty (20) days from entry of this order; and

4. The clerk shall terminate the following defendants from the action: Mosley, Stephens, Schilling, Ratcliff-Walker, Booker, Mason, Harper, Dent, Smith, Elko, Driskoll, Sams, and Degiovanni;14

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPRINKLE v. BARKSDALE
(Jul 4, 2009)