AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

WEGGELAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LTD PLAINTIFF v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.; and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS CONSERVATOR FOR INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, F.S.B. DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

BRIAN MILLER, District Judge

Before the court is the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for IndyMac Bank F.S.B. ("FDIC-R"), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Conservator for IndyMac Federal Bank, F.S.B. ("FDIC-C"). FDIC-R and FDIC-C assert that plaintiff Weggeland Development Group, LTD ("Weggeland") failed to exhaust the claims process set forth in the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), specifically 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(3)-(20), and thus, the court does not have jurisdiction to hear these claims. In response, Weggeland concedes that summary judgment is appropriate, subject to the reservation of its right to reinstitute proceedings in this court should adequate relief not be gained through the administrative claims process. Thus, summary judgment is granted.

Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8) is granted. The amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEGGELAND DEVELOPMENT GR. v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INS. CORP
(Aug 4, 2009)