Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DAVID PAYO, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND RUSTIN, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

DONETTA AMBROSE, District Judge

David Payo's Complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was received by the Clerk of Court on August 18, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report, filed on September 17, 2009, recommended that the Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants (Doc. 42) be granted with respect to Plaintiff's claim of verbal abuse, but that it be denied in all other respects. The parties were allowed ten days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made upon Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail at his place of incarceration. Objections were due on or before September 30, 2009, but none have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following ORDER is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of Oct., 2009,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 42) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bissoon (Doc. 52) is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAYO v. RUSTIN
(Oct 7, 2009)