RUTLEDGE v. ROACH

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 10-2310.

Attorney(S)

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Martha White Medley, Michael Anthony Nicholas, Daniel, Medley Kirby, PC, Danville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Judges

William Byrd Traxler
Robert Bruce King
Albert Diaz

Acts

The Public Health And Welfare — Civil Rights — Generally — Civil Action For Deprivation Of Rights

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

Merle T. RUTLEDGE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer ROACH of the Chatham, VA Police Department, Defendant-Appellee, and Town of Chatham, Virginia; Chatham, VA Police Department; Chief Martin Wright Of The Chatham, VA Police Department; Pittsyl

PER CURIAM:

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. Roach, No. 4:10-cv-00035-JLK-MFU, 2010 WL 3835662 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2010) 2010 WL 4791840 (Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Merle T. RUTLEDGE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer ROACH of the Chatham, VA Police Department, Defendant-Appellee, and Town of Chatham, Virginia; Chatham, VA Police Department; Chief Martin Wright Of The Chatham, VA Police Department; Pittsyl

Comments