Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ALBERT GIBBONI, Plaintiff, v. HYATT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

JOEL SLOMSKY, District Judge

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff Albert Gibboni's Motion to Remand to State Court (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 5), Hyatt Defendants' Response in Opposition to Remand (Doc. No. 7), Defendant Gibboni's Response to Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 9), Hyatt Defendants' Response in Opposition of Sanctions (Doc. No. 10), Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Remand (Doc. No. 12), and Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Sanctions (Doc. No. 13), and after a hearing on the Motions, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County;
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED;
3. The Clerk of Court shall close the case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GIBBONI v. HYATT CORPORATION
(Mar 22, 2011)