Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

IN THE INTEREST OF E.A.F., A CHILD

PER CURIAM

Motion Denied; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 12, 2013. On Appeal from the 314th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-02536J
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal of an interlocutory order that terminates the parental rights of father E.F. The order does not dispose of all parties and issues in this case and is therefore not a final order for purposes of appeal.

Appellant filed a motion to abate this appeal pending entry of a final judgment. On August 14, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court's intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant's response fails to demonstrate that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Accordingly, because there is no final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, we deny appellant's motion to abate and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f);

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and Donovan.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re E.A.F.
(Sep 12, 2013)