Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

In the Matter of Neal R. LEWIS, an Attorney.

PER CURIAM.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Anna E. Remet of counsel), for petitioner.
Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE and LYNCH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.


Neal R. Lewis was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He was previously admitted to practice in Florida in 1978, where he formerly maintained an office for the practice of law.

By order filed February 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Florida granted Lewis' uncontested petition for disciplinary revocation, with leave to seek readmission after five years ( Matter of Lewis,163 So.3d 509 [Fla.Sup.Ct.2015] ). This order was premised upon, among other things, Lewis' failure to maintain certain required trust account records and his conversion of $92,500 in client funds from his attorney trust account. Pursuant to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, “a disciplinary revocation is tantamount to disbarment” (Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, rule 3–5.1[g]; see The Florida Bar v. Hale, 762 So.2d 515, 517 [Fla.Sup.Ct.2000] ).

The Committee on Professional Standards now moves for an order imposing discipline in this state pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.19 by reason of the discipline imposed in Florida. Lewis has not replied or otherwise appeared in response to the motion, and has accordingly waived his available defenses ( see Matter of Halbfish, 78 A.D.3d 1320, 1321, 909 N.Y.S.2d 675 [2010]; see also Matter of Morin, 131 A.D.3d 799, 799, 15 N.Y.S.3d 707 [2015]; Matter of Radshaw, 130 A.D.3d 1139, 1139, 13 N.Y.S.3d 618 [2015] ).

We grant the Committee's motion and further conclude that, under the circumstances presented and in the interest of justice, Lewis should be disbarred in this state ( see Matter of Hock Loon Yong, 130 A.D.3d 1428, 1429, 12 N.Y.S.3d 925 [2015]; Matter of Felli, 116 A.D.3d 1335, 1335, 983 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2014]; Matter of Goodhart, 56 A.D.3d 889, 889–890, 866 N.Y.S.2d 454 [2008] ).

ORDERED that the motion of the Committee on Professional Standards is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Neal R. Lewis is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that Neal R. Lewis is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Lewis is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that Neal R. Lewis shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys ( see Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept. [22 NYCRR] § 806.9).

LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE and LYNCH, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Lewis
(Oct 1, 2015)