Order
1. The respondent herein was a member of the Kerala State Police Service. He was to retire on 30-9-1995 but the Government granted him extension of service for three months. A select list wherein the name of Respondent 1 was included for promotion to the Indian Police Service became operative on 17-11-1995. The Central Government had issued an office memorandum on 18-5-1977 whereunder it was provided that when a person is to retire he shall not be given extension of service for the purposes of promotion to the higher post. In view of the aforesaid memorandum the Central Government declined the promotion of the respondent to the Indian Police Service. At this stage the respondent filed a petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal was of the view that the office memorandum dated 18-5-1977 being executive instructions has no application where promotions are regulated by statutory rules and therefore the Central Government ought to have approved the name of the respondent for promotion to the post of the Indian Police Service. Consequently the petition was allowed. The appellant Union of India is in appeal before us.
2. We have heard the parties. On a perusal of the judgment, we are of the opinion that the view taken by the Tribunal that office memorandum dated 18-5-1977 was not applicable in the present case does not appear to be a correct view of law. However, as the Central Government has implemented the decision of the Tribunal and the respondent has continued to work on the promoted post and is to retire shortly after five months, we are not inclined to interfere with the matter. With the above observation, we dismiss this appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.