AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Pramod Kumar v. State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Lko . And 5 Others

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

    APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 748 of 2025

    Court No. - 11

    HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

    Heard Ms. Neelam Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government

    Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

    The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief:-

    "to direct the learned additional sessions judge / special judge S.C. / S.T.

    Act Bahraich in not deciding the criminal misc. case no. 117 /XII/2024

    Pramod Kumar Vs. Rakesh alias Nakchhed and others under section 156

    (3) Cr. P.C. P.S. Ramgaon District Bahraich, expeditiously within the

    stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble court in the interest of

    justice."

    Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application

    including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is

    disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for

    concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various

    pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the

    case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248,

    Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81 and

    Kadra Pahadiya and Others Vs. State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to

    speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of

    India.

    With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of.

    September 9, 2025 Mohit Singh/-

    Versus

    Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neelam Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

    (Saurabh Lavania,J.)

    Pramod Kumar .....Applicant(s)

    State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Lko . And 5 Others

    .....Opposite Party(s)

      1. 2025-09-10T09:55:11+0530
      2. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Pramod Kumar v. State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Lko . And 5 Others
    (Sep 9, 2025)