Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    SRI A N K RAJU v. COSMOPOLITAN CLUB (REGD)

    - 1 -

    HC-KAR

    NC: 2026:KHC:24665

    WP No. 14874 of 2026 C/W WP No.14835 of 2026

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MAY, 2026

    BEFORE

    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 14874 OF 2026 (GM-RES) C/W

    WRIT PETITION NO. 14835 OF 2026 (GM-RES) IN WP No. 14874 OF 2026

    BETWEEN:

    1. B S PAVAN KUMAR

    S/O CAPT B V SUBBANNA

    AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

    R/O NO. 1908, 31STMAIN ROAD

    BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE

    BANGALORE 560 070

    …PETITIONER

    (BY SRI. DEEPAK B R., ADVOCATE)

    AND:

    1. THE COSMOPOLITAN CLUB

    22NDCROSS, 3RDBLOCK

    JAYANAGAR

    DULY REP BY ITS PRESIDENT

    MR KARI GOWDA

    BANGALORE 560 011

    2. M R SANJAY

    S/O RAMASWAMY GOWDA M T

    AGED 55 YEARS

    SECRETARY (ILLEGAL APPOINTMENT)

    THE COSMOPOLITAN CLUB

    - 2 -

    22NDCROSS, 3RDBLOCK

    JAYANAGAR

    DULY REP BY ITS PRESIDENT

    BANGALORE 560 011

    …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.RAJASHEKAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R2)

    THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

    AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO

    DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO CONDUCT ANY SGM

    AS SCHEDULED ON 10THMAY 2026 AS IT IS VIOLATIVE OF THE

    UNDERTAKING GIVEN BY THEM BEFORE CITY CIVIL COURT,

    BANGALORE IN OS NO. 6688/24.

    IN WP No.14835/2026

    BETWEEN:

    1. SRI A N K RAJU

    S/O LATE A N NARAYANRAJU,

    AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

    R/AT. NO 164/A, 20THMAIN ROAD,

    JP NAGAR 2ND PHASE,

    BENGALURU-560078.

    MEMBER OF COSMOPOLITAN CLUB

    REG.NO-LM 1181

    …PETITIONER

    (BY SRI. H. KANTARAJU, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

    SRI.SHARANABASAVA CHANDRASHEKHARAYYA., ADVOCATE)

    AND:

    1. COSMOPOLITAN CLUB (REGD)

    22NDCROSS, 3RDBLOCK,

    JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011

    REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

    2. THE PRESIDENT,

    COSMOPOLITAN CLUB (REG)

    22NDCROSS, 3RDBLOCK,

    JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011

    - 3 -

    3. THE SECRETARY,

    COSMOPOLITAN CLUB (REG)

    22ND CROSS, 3RD BLOCK,

    JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011 …RESPONDENTS

    (BY SRI. S.RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3)

    THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

    AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO

    QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICES DTD. 30.04.2026 IN NO.

    CC/OA/023/2026-27 NO. CC/OA/024/2026-27 AND NO. CC/0A/025/2026-27 WHICH ARE AT ANNX-A, B AND C

    RESPECTIVELY AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS

    HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND

    CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, ETC.

    THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

    ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

    ORAL ORDER

    1. In the above captioned two writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the first special general body meeting notice dated 30.04.2026 issued by the respondent-Club convening the Special General Body Meeting of the Club on 10.05.2026 in the club premises.

    - 4 -

    2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submit that the impugned special general body meeting notice has been issued in contravention of the undertaking given by the office bearers of the respondent-Club in O.S.No.6688/2024 which is pending before the jurisdictional Civil Court at Bengaluru, and therefore, the same is bad in law. They also submit that the meeting notice has been issued in violation of the bye-laws of the club with an ulterior motive.

    3. The respondent-Club is not a 'State' or an 'Instrumentality of the State' as defined under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Under the circumstances, the action of the respondent-Club which is a private entity cannot be questioned in a writ petition. It appears that the parties are already before the jurisdictional Civil Court in O.S.No.6688/2024. Under the circumstances, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the impugned special general body meeting notice, it is for them to question the same in the said suit or by initiating appropriate proceedings before the proper forum. Since the writ petition filed against the impugned general body meeting notice is not maintainable, petitioners are not entitled

    - 5 -

    for the reliefs sought in the writ petition. Accordingly, petitions are dismissed.

    Sd/-

    (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

    JUDGE

    KK

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    SRI A N K RAJU v. COSMOPOLITAN CLUB (REGD)
    (May 7, 2026)