Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2024 KHC 6653
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2024 KHC 6653
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    DR. V. LOKESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    - 1 -

    NC: 2024:KHC:6653

    WP No. 4175 of 2024

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

    BEFORE

    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 4175 OF 2024 (S-RES)

    BETWEEN:

    DR. V. LOKESH

    S/O VENKATAPPA

    AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

    WORKING AS DIRECTOR OF KIDWAI MEMORIAL

    INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY

    (SINCE UNCEREMONIOUSLY REMOVED)

    BANGALORE

    R/A 18/2-3B, 13THA CROSS, JAYANAGAR 2NDBLOCK, BANGALORE-560011 …PETITIONER

    (BY SRI.UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR

    SMT.M.L.SUVARNA, ADVOCATE)

    AND:

    1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

    MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

    M S BUILDING

    BANGALORE-560001

    2. VICE CHAIRMAN

    KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY

    BANGALORE-560029

    3. DEAN CUM DIRECTOR

    DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION

    - 2 -

    BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH

    INSTITUTE (OLD BUILDING)

    I FLOOR, FORT ROAD

    K R ROAD, BANGALORE-560002

    4. DR SYED ALTHAF

    MAJOR BY AGE

    WORKING AS DIRECTOR(TEMPORARY)

    KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY

    BANGALORE-560029

    …RESPONDENTS

    (BY SRI.SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY.A.G AND SRI.REUBEN JACOB,

    AAG A/W SRI.B.RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1; SRI.PIYUSH KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT.SUMANA BALIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R3;

    PROF.RAVIVARMA KUMAR, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI.SHAKEER

    ABBAS, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4)

    THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE

    CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OFFICE ORDER

    BEARING NO. KMIO/ADM/EST-1/10/2024-ADMN-KMIO DATED 6.2.24 (ANNEXURE-J TO THE WP) ISSUED BY THE R2 BY

    ISSUING A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND GRANT

    ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

    HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

    ORDER

    Learned Advocate General, on instructions, makes a statement that respondent No.2 has resolved to withdraw the impugned order dated 06.02.2024.

    - 3 -

    In the light of statement made by learned Advocate General, nothing survives for consideration. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

    The pending interlocutory application, if any, does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.

    Sd/-

    JUDGE

    CA

    List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    DR. V. LOKESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
    (Feb 14, 2024)