Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 420, 406 I.P.C.
  • Sections 2/3 U.P Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 420, 406 I.P.C.
  • Sections 2/3 U.P Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Mamta Tripathi And Another v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others

    Court No. - 39

    Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5659 of 2020

    Petitioner :- Mamta Tripathi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

    Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

    The petitioner herein seeks for quashing of the FIR dated 31.5.2020 registered as Case Crime No.0197 of 2020 under Sections 2/3 U.P Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 P.S-Ikdil District-Etawah.

    It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the First Information Report has been lodged on the basis of solitary case of forgery lodged against the petitioner in Case crime no 141 of 2019 under Sections 420, 406 I.P.C.

    The allegations in the first information report are that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 alongwith one Rajat Tripathi, who is husband of petitioner no.1 and son of petitioner no.2, are involved in organized crimes of gaining undue temporal advantage over innocent students by providing them forged certificates of the courses in the name of the college being run by Rajat Tripathi.

    Looking to the seriousness of the allegations in the First Information Report we do not find it a fit case to entertain as any interference at this stage may impede the speedy investigation.

    The writ petition is found devoid of merit and hence dismissed

    Order Date :- 18.6.2020 Harshita

    Neutral Citation No. - 2020:AHC:53909-DB

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Mamta Tripathi And Another v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others
    (Jun 18, 2020)