AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    WIZTOWN PLANNERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED

    NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

    PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

    Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 259 of 2023

    IN THE MATTER OF:

    Wiztown Planners Pvt. Ltd. …Appellant

    Versus

    Vistra (ITCL) India Ltd. …Respondent Present:

    For Appellant : Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.K. Prasad, Mr. Sinha Shrey Nikhilesh, Mr. Nayan Dubey, Md. Faraaz Kha, Advocates

    For Respondent : Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Udit Mendiratta, Ms. Niharika Sharma, Mr. Tejas Jha and Mr. Saikat Sarkar, Advocates

    O R D E R

    22.03.2023: Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

    2. This appeal has been filed against an order dated 13.02.2023 by which the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Allahabad) before admission of Section 7 application, passed an order retraining Corporate Debtor from alienating or creating any third party interests/rights on the assets of the Corporate Debtor secured in favour Debenture Trustee till further orders.

    3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the order was passed only on the ground that certain information was not provided by the Appellant to the Debenture Trustee. It is stated that the Appellant is ready to provide information to the Debenture Trustee and also submitted an One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal to the Debenture Trustee.

    1

    Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 259 of 2023 Page 2 of 2

    4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that in the present matter, in Section 7 Notice was issued in October, 2022, Reply by the Corporate Debtor could be filed by 01.03.2023 and the next date has been fixed on 10.04.2023.

    5. We are of the view that since the Tribunal has already fixed 10.04.2023 as the next date of hearing, it is appropriate that the Appellant may request the Adjudicating Authority to hear the Application, in the event the settlement is not reached as contended by the Counsel for the Appellant.

    6. We are, thus of the opinion that no ground has been made out to entertain the appeal at this stage. We further note the submissions of the Appellant that the order impugned does not restrain the Appellant from taking steps in bringing relevant investments without creating 3rdParty interest which has already been restrained by the Adjudicating Authority. With these observations, we dispose of the appeal.

    [Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

    [Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

    akc/nn

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    WIZTOWN PLANNERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED
    (Mar 22, 2023)