Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT 1992
  • Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B, read with of Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992,
  • Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
  • Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992
  • Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.
  • India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as SEBI Act, 1992) and SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as IA Regulations, 2013).
  • sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992 for violation of section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT 1992
  • Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B, read with of Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992,
  • Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
  • Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992
  • Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.
  • India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as SEBI Act, 1992) and SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as IA Regulations, 2013).
  • sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992 for violation of section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

SEBI received complaints alleging that M/s Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions (a partnership firm whose partners are Mr. Shailendra Sen, Mr. Amit Jain and Mr. Chirag Sharma) was providing investment advisory services without the requisite registration under the SEBI Act, 1992 and the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 ("IA Regulations"). SEBI examined the firm's website (including archived pages), complaints on consumer forums, and bank account records from ICICI Bank, Axis Bank and Central Bank of India. The examination revealed that the firm advertised advisory services, offered subscription-based advisory packages for specified fees, and received substantial credits in its bank accounts and through the PayU payment gateway.

SEBI issued a show cause notice dated March 12, 2020 alleging violations of Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations and sought submissions on proposed directions including debarment, refund of fees collected and restrictions on association with listed entities/intermediaries. The Noticees responded by written submissions and availed a personal hearing on September 23, 2021. SEBI considered the materials, the Noticees' replies (including letters dated April 06, 2020 and October 05, 2021), and a prior SEBI order in a related matter (Capital Heed Financial Research) in reaching a final decision issued January 18, 2022.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the Noticees carried out investment advisory activities for consideration without obtaining a certificate of registration from SEBI, thereby violating Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.
  2. Whether, having found such violations (if any), SEBI should pass directions including refund of fees, public notice of refund modalities, restraints on bank accounts and asset disposition, debarment from the securities market, and restrictions on association with listed companies and intermediaries.
  3. Whether subsequent registration obtained by Noticee no. 2 (in the proprietorship Capital Heed Financial Research) or alleged bona fide belief that activities fell within the scope of an authorised person can mitigate or excuse the alleged past unregistered advisory activities.

Arguments of the Parties

Noticees' Arguments

  • The partnership operated as an Authorised Person/sub-broker (and not as an 'investment adviser') and thus believed it was not required to obtain separate registration as an investment adviser.
  • Upon receipt of SEBI's letter dated March 14, 2016, Cash Cow ceased advisory operations immediately; however, due to earlier commitments they serviced existing clients up to February 2017 to achieve proper closure and minimize client losses.
  • Any advisory activity undertaken was in genuine and bona-fide belief that it fell within the scope of authorised person activities; therefore, no wilful violation of SEBI regulations was intended.
  • Noticee no. 2 passed the NISM investment adviser examination, applied to SEBI for registration as an investment adviser under the proprietorship Capital Heed Financial Research, and registration was granted with effect from December 29, 2017; any alleged past violation committed in good faith may be pardoned.
  • Noticee no. 2 and others claimed hardships including losses due to COVID-19 and prior interim orders affecting related firms; they also stated that partners Mr. Chirag Sharma and Mr. Amit Jain ceased active participation by end of February 2017.

SEBI's Position (as framed in the SCN and analysis)

  • Cash Cow held itself out as providing investment advisory services on its website, sold subscription advisory packages for consideration, and collected fees via bank deposits and PayU gateway—constituting investment advisory activity for consideration.
  • The Noticees did not hold a certificate of registration from SEBI as required under Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations while conducting such activities, thus violating Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act read with Regulation 3(1).
  • The Noticees continued to receive advisory-related payments even after claiming to have ceased advisory operations following SEBI's March 2016 letter, undermining the contention that they stopped activities immediately.
  • Noticee no. 2's later registration and claims of good faith were insufficient and not mitigating, particularly in view of a prior SEBI order finding false declarations by Noticee no. 2 in his registration application (Capital Heed Financial Research).

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
SEBI Order dated June 01, 2021 in the matter of M/s Capital Heed Financial Research (Proprietor: Mr. Shailendra Sen) Found that Mr. Shailendra Sen knowingly made a false declaration in his registration application by not disclosing prior engagement in advisory activities; held violations of Clauses of the Code of Conduct and IA Regulations (including misrepresentation and nondisclosure). The Court relied on this prior order to conclude that Noticee no. 2 had attempted to conceal prior unregistered advisory activities, rendering his later registration an unreliable mitigating factor; it declined to treat that registration as justification or pardon for earlier unregistered advisory activities.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court's analysis proceeded by examining the statutory definitions and the material facts:

  1. Statutory definitions and requirements: The Court referred to Regulation 2(1)(m) of the IA Regulations, 2013 (definition of "investment adviser") and Regulation 2(1)(l) (definition of "investment advice"). It noted Regulation 3(1) which mandates that no person shall act as or hold out as an investment adviser without obtaining a certificate of registration from SEBI. The Court also referenced the statutory requirement in Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act that intermediaries engaged in such activities must hold registration.
  2. Evidence of advisory activity for consideration: The Court considered the archived website content showing representations that Cash Cow provided advisory services, sample subscription packages with stated fees (e.g., Stock Future Tips fees ranging from Rs.8,000 per month to Rs.48,000 yearly), and offered advisory services across segments (stock cash, futures, forex, etc.). The website listed bank account details and PayU as a payment option.
  3. Bank account analysis: The Court examined account opening forms and transaction statements from ICICI Bank, Axis Bank and Central Bank of India. It observed aggregate credits into Cash Cow’s accounts (aggregate figures cited: Rs.10,81,521; Rs.24,80,873; Rs.29,89,169; total aggregated credits of Rs.65,51,563 in one depiction and an aggregate total of Rs.1,03,74,093 credited during October 2015 to October 2017 as noted elsewhere). Significant portions were identified as payments received via PayU Money and as round-figure credits consistent with fee payments.
  4. Admissions and timing: The Noticees had acknowledged initiating advisory services from August 2014 and accepted revenue from advisory services from 22 clients. They had submitted to SEBI in March 2016 that they would stop advisory services and change the website; nonetheless, subsequent receipts via PayU and cash deposits aggregated to substantial sums during April 2016 to February/October 2017, contradicting the cessation claim.
  5. On bona fide belief and mitigation: The Court rejected the Noticees’ plea of bona fide belief that advisory work fell within the scope of an authorised person, emphasizing the settled principle that ignorance of law is no excuse and pointing to the clear statutory/regulatory requirement of registration and the safeguards embedded in IA Regulations (e.g., qualification, certification, net worth, processes and disclosures) that differentiate registered investment advisers from authorised persons/sub-brokers.
  6. On concealment and reliability of later registration: The Court relied on the earlier SEBI order (June 01, 2021) concerning Noticee no. 2 which found false declarations and nondisclosure in his registration application for Capital Heed Financial Research. The Court treated that finding as evidence that Noticee no. 2 had concealed prior unregistered activities and therefore his later SEBI registration could not be accepted as a mitigating factor.
  7. On attribution and partnership law: Applying Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, the Court reasoned that the partnership firm comprises partners acting together; thus, the partnership and partners (Noticees no.1–4) are collectively responsible for the unregistered advisory activities.
  8. Conclusion of violation: Based on the above, the Court concluded that the Noticees were acting as investment advisers for consideration without registration, thereby violating Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations. The factual matrix (website representations, bank receipts, acknowledgments) and the statutory framework (definitions and registration requirements) formed the basis for imposing remedial and punitive directions.

Holding and Implications

Core ruling: The Noticees were held to have acted as investment advisers for consideration without obtaining the required certificate of registration from SEBI and were found in violation of Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.

Direct Orders and Consequences (as directed in the order)

  • Refunds: The Noticees are directed, jointly and severally, to refund within three months from the coming into force of the Order the money received from clients/investors as fees or consideration for unregistered investment advisory activities.
  • Public notice: The Noticees must issue public notices (one English national daily, one Hindi national daily and one local daily) detailing the modalities for refund and contact details within 15 days of the Order coming into force.
  • Mode of repayment: Repayments to clients/investors must be effected only through banking channels that ensure an audit trail (Demand Draft, Pay Order, electronic fund transfer, or other appropriate channels).
  • Restraint on assets: The Noticees are prohibited from selling assets, properties, and holdings of mutual funds/shares/securities except for the sole purpose of making the directed refunds.
  • Bank directions: ICICI Bank, Axis Bank and Central Bank of India are directed not to allow any debits/withdrawals from and credits to the specified Cash Cow accounts except debits for purposes of the directed refunds; the banks must enforce these directions strictly.
  • Report of completion: After completing refunds, the Noticees shall file a report certified by an independent Chartered Accountant with SEBI within 15 days after the three-month refund period; the restraints on assets and accounts will cease once refunds are complete and the report is filed.
  • Recovery provision: If the Noticees fail to comply with the refund/report directions, SEBI may recover the amounts under Section 28A of the SEBI Act or other applicable securities law provisions.
  • Debarment from securities market:
    • Noticee no. 2 (Mr. Shailendra Sen) is debarred from accessing the securities market and dealing in securities for two years from the date of this order or until two years from completion of refunds, whichever is later. This debarment shall run concurrently with a prior three-year debarment imposed in the June 01, 2021 SEBI order in the Capital Heed matter.
    • Noticees no. 1, 3 and 4 (the partnership entity and the other partners) are debarred from accessing the securities market and dealing in securities for one year from the date of this order or until one year from completion of refunds, whichever is later.
  • Restrictions on association: Noticee no. 2 is restrained from associating with listed companies, companies raising funds from the public, or registered intermediaries for two years (or until two years from completion of refunds), and Noticees no. 1, 3 and 4 are similarly restrained for one year (or until one year from completion of refunds).
  • Prohibition on future advisory activity: The Noticees shall not, during or after the period of debarment/restraint, directly or indirectly provide investment advisory services or undertake any securities market activity without obtaining a SEBI registration as required by law.
  • Effectiveness and timing: The order comes into force immediately. However, due to COVID-19 exceptional circumstances, the directions in paragraph 19 other than sub-paragraphs 19(viii)–19(xi) (i.e., other than the debarment and association restraints) shall come into force within 30 days from the date of the order.

Broader Implications

The Order applies these remedies and restraints directly to the Noticees and directs enforcement steps (including bank restrictions and refund mechanisms). The Order does not purport to set out any novel legal principle beyond applying the IA Regulations and SEBI Act to the facts; its practical effect is to require repayment to clients, impose market access debarments and association restrictions for specified durations, and to prevent future unregistered advisory activity by the Noticees without SEBI registration.

Note: This summary is confined to and based exclusively on the content of the provided SEBI final order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions (dated January 18, 2022) and does not include information beyond that order.

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking and Advisory Solutions

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 1 of 20

    WTM/AB/WRO/WRO/14741/2021-22

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

    FINAL ORDER

    UNDER SECTIONS 11, 11(4), and 11B OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

    BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992.

    In respect of:

    Noticee

    No.

    Name of the entity PAN No.

    1. M/s. Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions AAIFC2855R

    2. Mr. Shailendra Sen (Partner) BUXPS9559Q

    3. Mr. Amit Jain (Partner) AGSPJ3021G

    4. Mr. Chirag Sharma (Partner) ASWPS7685C

    In the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    (Aforesaid entities are hereinafter individually referred to as by their respective name or noticee number

    and collectively as “the Noticees”.)

    1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI”) had

    received complaints against M/s. Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions,

    (hereinafter referred to as “Cash Cow”), wherein it was prima facie alleged that

    that Cash Cow was engaged in ‘investment advisory services’ without having the

    requisite registration as mandated under the Securities and Exchange Board of

    India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI Act, 1992”) and SEBI (Investment

    Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “IA Regulations, 2013”).

    Cash Cow is a partnership firm whose partners are Mr. Shailendra Sen (Noticee

    no. 2), Mr. Amit Jain (Noticee no. 3) and Mr. Chirag Sharma (Noticee no. 4).

    2. Based on the same, an examination of the complaints was carried out by SEBI, as

    follows:

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 2 of 20

    a) The website www.cashcowresearch.com of the Noticees was browsed for

    information, but the same was not active at that time. The archive pages of the

    website was downloaded from www.archive.org to gather information. From

    the pages downloaded, it was observed that the Noticees had disclosed the

    following in its website:

    (i) Cash Cow is a leading financial services company in area of broking

    and advisory industries in India. We at Cash Cow provide broking

    platform for online/offline trading @ very low brokerage of 0.015 paisa.

    In broking, we have registered in all exchanges NSE, BSE, MCX,

    NCDEX, MCX-SX. In advisory about stocks, commodity, currency, agri,

    etc., research is based upon fundamental & technical analysis of all

    counters, scripts, & indexes.

    (ii) We offer Advisory Services, Broking Services, Portfolio Services, and

    Fund Management.

    (iii) Portfolio Services: In this service, we provide you an efficient return on

    your investment with transparency.

    (iv) Advisory Services: In this service we provide you recommendation in all

    segments such as Stock cash, Stock future Tips, BTST Tips, Forex, etc.

    (v) Various packages were being offered for subscription at specified rates

    and for specific products. One such illustration is given below:

    Stock Future Tips– This service is for the traders who trade in Stock

    Future. These Stock Future Tips are the after effect of center

    exploration and investigation and help you to get a huge profit. Our call

    via SMS will reach you as soon as the analysts send so there is no time

    lag between you reading it and working on the call.

    The fee ranges from Rs.8,000/- per month to Rs.48,000/- yearly.

    (vi) The payment to subscribe to the services can be made directly to the

    bank accounts opened in the name of Cash Cow with ICICI Bank, Axis

    Bank and Central Bank of India, the details of which were mentioned on

    their website. Alternatively, payments can be made through PayU

    Money.

    (vii) A search was also made on the internet to gather any other

    information about Cash Cow. It was observed that there were

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 3 of 20

    complaints on www.consumercomplaints.in, wherein the complainants

    have alleged that Cash Cow had promised that they will get good

    returns from the market.

    b) The Account Opening Forms (AOF), KYC documents and transaction /

    account statements of bank accounts of Cash Cow obtained from ICICI

    Bank, Axis Bank and Central Bank of India were examined and the following

    observations were made:

    1) ICICI Bank (A/c No. 657305500056 and 004105014315) –

    (i) A/c No. 657305500056 was opened in March, 2013 in the name of

    partnership firm, Cash Cow, having its address at G2, Suryansh

    Exotika, Block E, 94 Alok Nagar, Kanadiya Road, Indore.

    (ii) The email id is cashcowbroking@gmail.com and PAN: AAIFC2855R.

    (iii) The partners are Mr. Amit Jain and Mr. Shailendra Sen.

    (iv) The industry is mentioned as Commodities Broking and Advisory.

    (v) The A/c no. 657305500056 did not have many transactions, and

    received Rs.15,000/- during June 2014 to August, 2014.

    (vi) With respect to A/c no. 004105014315, the entity had received

    credits aggregating to Rs. 10,81,521/- during June, 2015 to February,

    2017.

    (vii) Balance amount available in the a/c as on February 24, 2017 is

    Rs.77,037/-.

    (viii) Analysis of bank account revealed that there were 126 credit

    transactions which were in round figure ranging from Rs.1,000/- to

    Rs.1,00,051/- aggregating to Rs.10,81,521/-. The credits were mainly

    in the form of cash deposits and mobile money transfers.

    2) Axis Bank (A/c No. 915020002699502) –

    (i) A/c No. 915020002699502 was opened in January, 2015 in the name

    of partnership firm, Cash Cow, having its address at G2, Suryansh

    Exotika, Block E, 94 Alok Nagar, Kanadiya Road, Indore.

    (ii) The email id is shailendra.sen@cashcowresearch.com and PAN:

    AAIFC2855R.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 4 of 20

    (iii) The partners are Mr. Shailendra Sen and Mr. Chirag Sharma.

    (iv) As per the AOF, the type of business activity is advisory service.

    (v) The entity has received credits aggregating to Rs. 24,80,873/- during

    the period January, 2015 and February, 2017. Out of the said amount

    of Rs. 24,80,873/-, credited into Axis Bank account from PayU Money

    amounted to Rs. 10,34,361/-.

    (vi) Credits from PayU Money were observed during the period December,

    2016 and February, 2017. The credit amounts received through PayU

    Money appear to be fees paid by clients for the purpose of investment

    advisory services.

    (vii) Balance amount available in the account as on February 27, 2017 is

    Rs.1,80,143/-.

    (viii) Analysis of bank account revealed that there were 95 credit

    transactions which were in round figure ranging from Rs. 500/- to Rs.

    1,00,000/- aggregating to Rs.14,46,512/- (excluding payment

    gateways). These amounts appeared to have been collected as an

    advisory fee.

    3) Central Bank of India (A/c No. 3213140286) –

    (i) The entity has received credits aggregating to Rs. 29,89,169/- during

    the period August, 2014 and December, 2016. Out of Rs. 29,89,169/-,

    credits from PayU Money amounted to Rs. 27,88,169/-.

    (ii) Credits from PayU Money were observed to be during the period

    August, 2014 and December, 2016. The credit amounts received

    through PayU Money appear to be fees paid by clients for the purpose

    of investment advisory services.

    (iii) Balance amount available in the Account as on January 28, 2019 is

    Rs. 1,689/-.

    (iv) The bank was unable to provide a copy of the AoF of the entity since

    the records were not traceable due to the branch office being flooded

    with water in 2013 and majority of records were damaged, but has

    informed that as per the date available in their software, the account

    was opened by Partners, Mr. Shailendra Sen and Mr. Amit Jain.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 5 of 20

    4) A tabular depiction of money credited into the various bank accounts

    held by cash cow is as under:

    Sl.

    No.

    Bank Account No Transaction

    Period

    Aggregate Value of

    Credit Transactions

    (in Rs.)

    1. ICICI Bank A/c No.

    004105014315

    October 2015 to

    July 2017 10,81,521

    2. Axis Bank A/c No.

    915020050222831

    October 2015 to

    Oct 2017 24,80,873

    3. Central Bank A/c No.

    3213140286

    August 2014 to

    December 2016 29,89,169

    Total 65,51,563

    4. Credits through PayU Money 38,22,530

    c) Further, complaints filed against Cash Cow were examined and the details of

    the same are as under:

    (i) Mr. Vikram Oswal has, inter-alia, alleged that he paid Rs. 10,000/- on

    January 7, 2017 for profit commitment base plan (PCB) in which Cash Cow

    has committed to give minimum profit of Rs. 80,000/- in 30 days. From the

    email dated January 7, 2017 sent by Cash Cow to the complainant, it is

    seen that Cash Cow was providing investment advisory activity without

    obtaining a certificate of registration as an investment adviser from SEBI.

    The relevant extract of the said e-mail is reproduced below.

    Subscription details

    Payment Mode: Payment Gateway

    Amount: 10000

    Payment Date: 2017-01-07

    Invoice No: INV431

    Service details

    Services Pack: PCB Pack

    Start date: 2017-01-09

    Expiry date: 2017-02-12

    Cash Cow strictly follow Trading principles and Stop Loss policy wherein

    Customer by default agree to not do/enter any trade without defined Stop

    Loss.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 6 of 20

    (ii) Mr. Devesh has alleged that he has been receiving SMSs from Cash Cow

    asking him to subscribe to their services. Mr. Devesh has submitted copy

    of SMSs received in March, 2015, extract of which is given below:

    Stock future Pack:

    SEL IDFC MAR FUTURE

    BELOW 171.50 SL 172.60

    TGTS 170.50, 169.50

    Cash cow research

    Stock Future Pack:

    Ist TARGET ACHIEVED IN IDFC MAR FUTURE SELL

    HOPE YOU BOOKED PROFIT

    Stock Future Pack:

    Kindly exit from ONGC MAR FUT BUY CALL

    d) SEBI sent a letter dated March 14, 2016 to the entity’s address in Orbit Mall,

    Vijay Nagar, Indore, seeking information about unregistered investment

    advisory activities. Mr. Shailendra Sen (Noticee no. 2), on behalf of Cash Cow,

    vide its letter dated March 23, 2016 had, inter-alia, submitted the following:

    (i) They had incorporated the partnership firm on September 05, 2012 with 2

    partners, Mr. Amit Jain (Noticee no. 3) and Mr. Shailendra Sen (Noticee

    no. 2). Mr. Chirag Sharma (Noticee no. 4) joined as a partner on October

    15, 2014. The objective of the partnership was to offer broking services,

    internet sales and advisory services.

    (ii) They initiated only broking and internet sales in the years 2012-14. They

    initiated advisory services in the month of August, 2014 and the revenue

    from advisory services is only Rs.1,90,800/- collected from 22 clients.

    (iii) The office was shifted from Alok Nagar to Orbit mall in January, 2015.

    (iv) That they were of an understanding that since they are registered as a

    sub broker and as mentioned in regulation 4 (g) of SEBI IA Regulations,

    2013 granting exemption to sub broker exempts them from the

    requirement of getting registered. However, post receiving SEBI letter,

    they now know that they are required to get registered as an Investment

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 7 of 20

    Advisor besides being an Authorized Person. They have stopped offering

    advisory services with immediate effect and shall offer such advisory only

    once they are registered, for which they shall make an application in the

    required format as soon as possible. Further, that requisite changes have

    been made in the website to ensure that no advisory sales are conducted

    from their website.

    e) However, an examination of the bank accounts revealed that Cash Cow had

    received payments towards advisory business subsequent to its submission to

    SEBI in March, 2016. It was observed that Cash Cow had received payments

    amounting to Rs.23,48,652 through Pay U Money gateway during the period

    April, 2016 to February, 2017. Further, Cash Cow had also received cash

    deposits and credits amounting to Rs.15,15,805/- during the period April, 2016

    to February, 2017 in their Bank accounts, subsequent to their submission to

    SEBI that they would stop their advisory business.

    f) Accordingly, it was prima face observed that:

    a. Cash Cow and its partners were carrying out unregistered investment

    advisory activity without obtaining registration from SEBI and through their

    website mobilized a sum of Rs. 65.51 lakhs during the period August,

    2014 to October, 2017. Cash Cow vide its letter dated March 23, 2016 to

    SEBI had also accepted that it was providing advisory services from

    August, 2014 and was not aware that SEBI registration was necessary.

    Further, Cash Cow also submitted that it would stop rendering such

    services and make changes to its website.

    b. Subsequent to submissions to SEBI in March, 2016 that they will close

    their business, Cash Cow has mobilized Rs. 38,64,457/- during the period

    April, 2016 to October, 2017.

    c. Cash Cow Broking is also registered as Authorized Person with Angel

    Broking Ltd and Angel Commodities Broking Pvt. Ltd.

    3. In view of the above, a show cause notice was issued to the Noticees on March

    12, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as “SCN”), alleging that the Noticees have carried

    out investment advisory activities without obtaining a certificate of registration from

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 8 of 20

    SEBI. Accordingly, it was alleged that the Noticees have violated Section 12(1) of

    SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013. The SCN

    called upon the Noticees to show cause as to why suitable directions including

    debarment from securities market, refund of fees collected, non-association with

    listed entities, intermediaries, etc., should not be passed under sections 11(1),

    11(4) and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992 for violation of section 12(1) of the SEBI Act,

    1992 read with regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.

    4. The Noticees were provided with the opportunity to file their objections/reply, if

    any, within 21 days from the receipt of SCN and were also provided with an

    opportunity of personal hearing before SEBI. The Noticees filed their reply to the

    SCN vide letter dated April 06, 2020. The matter was then placed before me on

    August 05, 2021 and following the principles of natural justice, an opportunity of

    personal hearing was granted to the Noticees on September 23, 2021. On

    September 23, 2021, Noticee no. 2 appeared on behalf of all the Noticees and

    made submissions. The Noticee no. 2 also sought time to file written submissions

    and accordingly, ten days’ time was granted to the Noticees to file their written

    submissions. Thereafter, the Noticee no. 2 filed written submissions on October

    05, 2021.

    5. The Noticees vide letters dated April 06, 2020 and October 05, 2021 have made

    the following submissions:

    a. By way of a partnership deed dated September 05, 2012 a partnership firm in

    the name and style of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory came to be constituted

    which initially comprised of two partners namely Shri Amit Jain and myself and

    thereafter on October 15, 2014, a third partner Shri Chirag Sharma joined

    Cash Cow.

    b. The firm/partners were carrying on activities as an Authorised Person and not

    as an Investment Advisor.

    c. That on March 14, 2016, when SEBI wrote a letter to Cash Cow firm seeking

    information about the alleged role as an Investment Advisor, they had ceased

    the operations of Cash Cow with immediate effect. However, because of our

    earlier commitments, they were compelled to service the existing clients upto

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 9 of 20

    February 2017 in order to achieve a proper closure to the operations mainly

    as regards our operations and also to minimize the losses of then existing

    clients. However, it may be noted the partnership firm stood dissolved w.e.f.

    March 29, 2017 and no new clients were on board from April 2016 pursuant to

    the SEBI notice.

    d. Further, without prejudice to what has been said herein and assuming for the

    sake of argument and without admitting that Cash Cow/or myself in my

    personal capacity were engaged in services as an Investment Advisor, I

    submit that the services were being provided under genuine and a bona-fide

    belief that the said business was well within the scope of work of an

    authorised person of a sub-broker and that the Partners was not required to

    obtain any separate registration as an investment advisor and that they were

    not in violation of any SEBI Regulations.

    e. Further, I wish to point out that I have cleared my investment advisor

    examination conducted by National Institute of Securities Market and on

    September 11, 2017, I applied before SEBI for grant of certificate of

    registration as an investment advisor under the proprietorship concern named

    Capital Heed Financial Research and the registration was duly granted w.e.f.

    December 29, 2017 and hence without prejudice to what has been said herein

    and assuming for the sake of argument and without admitting that Cash

    Cow/or myself in my personal capacity were engaged as an investment

    advisor, I say that any alleged violation that I may have committed in good

    faith during the period between August 2014 to Feb 2017 may be pardoned.

    f. I had already suffered a lot of losses due to Covid-19 and interim order

    received from SEBI in Nov 18, 2019 for not doing any new or existing sales in

    my SEBI registered firm Capital Heed Financial Research, and I did 100%

    compliance as said by SEBI. In the final order in the matter of Capital Heed

    Financial Research, I am already banned for three years from securities

    market. Mr. Chirag Sharma and Mr. Amit Jain left fully of the working of

    investment advisory and broking since end of February 2017. And even

    before they were not actively participate in the working of cash cow.

    6. I note that the definition of investment adviser, as given in Regulation 2(1)(m) of IA

    Regulations, 2013, provides that investment adviser means “any person, who for

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 10 of 20

    consideration, is engaged in the business of providing investment advice to clients

    or other persons or group of persons and includes any person who holds out

    himself as an investment adviser, by whatever name called”. Regulation 2(1) (l) of

    the IA Regulations defines investment advice as “advice relating to investing in,

    purchasing, selling or otherwise dealing in securities or investment products, and

    advice on investment portfolio containing securities or investment products,

    whether written, oral or through any other means of communication for the benefit

    of the client and shall include financial planning.”

    7. I note that the Noticees had a website www.cashcowresearch.com and the

    Noticees had inter alia claimed on its website that it is providing investment

    advisory services and that they offer recommendation in all segments such as

    stock cash, stock future tips, BTST tips, forex etc. As per the website, they offered

    various packages for subscription at specified rates and for specific products. One

    such illustration is given below:

    Stock Future Tips– This service is for the traders who trade in Stock

    Future. These Stock Future Tips are the after effect of center exploration

    and investigation and help you to get a huge profit. Our call via SMS will

    reach you as soon as the analysts send so there is no time lag between

    you reading it and working on the call.

    The fee ranges from Rs.8,000/- per month to Rs.48,000/- yearly.

    8. I find that these services were being offered by the Noticees in lieu of the

    consideration which could be paid by the investor concerned directly to the bank

    accounts opened in the name of M/s. Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions with

    ICICI Bank (A/c No. 657305500056 and 004105014315), Axis Bank (A/c No.

    915020002699502) and Central Bank of India (A/c No. 3213140286), the details of

    which were mentioned on their website and alternatively through PayU money

    which was linked to their Axis Bank and Central Bank of India accounts. From the

    details of the said bank accounts, I note that in aggregate, a total of Rs.

    1,03,74,093/- has been credited during the period October 2015 to October 2017.

    From the aforesaid facts, I find that Cash Cow was engaged in giving advice

    relating to investing in, purchasing, selling or otherwise dealing in securities or

    investment products, through its website www.cashcowresearch.com. I note that

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 11 of 20

    the Account Opening Form for the ICICI Bank Account, copy of which was

    forwarded by the bank to SEBI, that the type of industry of Cash Cow is

    Commodities broking and advisory and the partners are mentioned as Mr. Amit

    Jain (Noticee no. 3) and Mr. Shailendra Sen (Noticee no. 2). I note that the

    Account Opening Form for the Axis Bank Account, copy of which was forwarded

    by the bank to SEBI, that the type of industry of Cash Cow is advisory services

    and the partners are mentioned as Mr. Chirag Sharma (Noticee no. 4) and Mr.

    Shailendra Sen (Noticee no. 2). I also note from the documents provided by

    Central Bank of India that the account was opened by partners, Mr. Amit Jain

    (Noticee no. 3) and Mr. Shailendra Sen (Noticee no. 2). Further, I note that the

    Noticees vide letter dated March 23, 2016 to SEBI had submitted that they had

    incorporated a partnership firm on September 05, 2012 with 2 partners, Mr. Amit

    Jain (Noticee no. 3) and Mr. Shailendra Sen (Noticee no. 2) and Mr. Chirag

    Sharma (Noticee no. 4) joined as partner on October 15, 2014. The Noticees

    submitted that the objective of the partnership was to offer broking services,

    internet sales and advisory services in the share market and they initiated advisory

    service in the month of August, 2014 and collected revenue from advisory services

    from 22 clients. Thus, I find that Cash Cow was the partnership concern of Mr.

    Shailendra Sen (Noticee no. 2), Mr. Amit Jain (Noticee no. 3) and Mr. Chirag

    Sharma (Noticee no. 4) and were engaged in investment advisory activity. In view

    of this, I find that Noticees were providing the investment advice, in lieu of

    consideration. In terms of Regulation 2(1) (l) of IA Regulations, 2013 such an

    advice is “investment advice”. Therefore, I find that Noticees were engaged in the

    business of providing investment advice to public, for consideration and were thus,

    acting as an investment adviser, as defined under Regulation 2(1) (m) of the IA

    Regulations, 2013.

    9. In this regard, the Noticees have submitted that services were being provided

    under genuine and a bona-fide belief that the said business was well within the

    scope of work of an authorised person of a sub-broker and that the Partners were

    not required to obtain any separate registration as an investment advisor and that

    they were not in violation of any SEBI Regulations. Further, the Noticees have

    submitted that upon receiving SEBI letter on March 14, 2016 seeking information

    about the alleged role as an investment advisor, they ceased the operations of

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 12 of 20

    Cash Cow with immediate effect. However, that because of their earlier

    commitments, they were compelled to service the existing clients upto February

    2017 in order to achieve a proper closure to their operations mainly as regards

    their operations and also to minimize the losses of their then existing clients.

    10. With regard to the aforesaid submissions of the Noticees, I note that it is a well

    settled law that ignorance of law is no excuse. Hence, the Noticees cannot take

    the plea that they had genuine and bona-fide belief that the said business was well

    within the scope of work of an authorised person of a sub-broker as the provisions

    of the SEBI Act, 1992 and the IA Regulations, 2013 are clear in this regard that a

    person must obtain a certificate of registration before acting as an investment

    advisor. I note that Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 provides as under:

    “No stock broker, sub-broker, share transfer agent, banker to an issue, trustee of trust

    deed, registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter, portfolio manager, investment

    adviser and such other intermediary who may be associated with securities market shall

    buy, sell or deal in securities except under, and in accordance with, the conditions of a

    certificate of registration obtained from the Board in accordance with the regulations

    made under this Act:”

    11. In order to protect the interest of investors and to maintain integrity of the

    securities market, IA Regulations, 2013 provides safeguards to ensure that the

    investors who receive investment advice are protected. One such safeguard is

    that any person carrying out investment advisory activities has to obtain

    registration from SEBI as required under Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations,

    2013. Regulation 3(1) provides that, “On and from the commencement of these

    regulations, no person shall act as an investment adviser or hold itself out as an

    investment adviser unless he has obtained a certificate of registration from the

    Board under these regulations” and conduct its activities in accordance with the

    provisions of IA Regulations. Further, I note that for seeking a certificate of

    registration for acting as an investment adviser, an entity is required to satisfy

    inter alia the following requirements, as provided under IA Regulations, 2013:

    (i) An application for seeking certificate of registration to be made to Local Office,

    Regional Office or Head Office, of SEBI, as the case may be, in Form A as

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 13 of 20

    specified in the First Schedule to IA Regulations, 2013 along with requisite non-

    refundable application fee;

    (ii) The applicant, in case of an individual investment adviser or its principal officer

    in case of a non-individual investment adviser shall be appropriately qualified

    and certified as under:

    a. A professional qualification or post-graduate degree or post graduate

    diploma (minimum two years in duration) in finance, accountancy,

    business management, commerce, economics, capital market, banking,

    insurance or actuarial science from a university or an institution

    recognized by the Central Government or any State Government or a

    recognised foreign university or institution or association or a

    professional qualification by completing a Post Graduate Program in the

    Securities Market (Investment Advisory) from NISM of a duration not

    less than one year or a professional qualification by obtaining a CFA

    Charter from the CFA Institute;

    b. An experience of at least five years in activities relating to advice in

    financial products or securities or fund or asset or portfolio

    management;

    c. Applicant in case of individual investment adviser or its principal officer

    in case of a non-individual investment adviser, and persons associated

    with investment advice shall have, at all times a certification on financial

    planning or fund or asset or portfolio management or investment

    advisory services, from (a) NISM; or (b) any other organization or

    institution including Financial Planning Standards Board of India or any

    recognized stock exchange in India provided such certification is

    accredited by NISM.

    (iii) Individual applicant must have net worth of not less than 5 lakh rupees and

    non-individual applicant must have net worth of not less than 50 lakh rupees.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 14 of 20

    12. Therefore, I note that safeguards provided under IA Regulations, 2013 requires

    continued minimum professional qualification and net-worth requirement for

    investment adviser, including disclosure of all conflict of interest, prohibition on

    entering into transactions which are contrary to advice given for 15 days, risk

    profiling of investors, maintaining documented process for selecting investment for

    client based on client’s objective and risk profile, understanding the nature and

    risks of products or assets selected for clients, etc. Hence, the contention of the

    Noticees that they acted in genuine and bona fide belief is untenable.

    13. Further, with regard to the submission of the Noticees that they ceased the

    operations of Cash Cow with immediate effect in March 2016, but because of their

    earlier commitments, they were compelled to service the existing clients upto

    February 2017, I note that Cash Cow had submitted in March, 2016 to SEBI that it

    would stop rendering such services and make changes to its website. However, I

    note that subsequent to making submissions to SEBI in March, 2016 that they will

    close their business, Cash Cow had mobilized Rs. 38,64,457/- during the period

    April, 2016 to February, 2017. Hence, I note that the Noticees have continued to

    act as investment advisors even after submitting to SEBI that it would stop its

    unregistered investment advisory services. Further, the submission of the Noticees

    that they were compelled to service their existing clients due to earlier

    commitments is absolutely unacceptable and is an admission of their continuing

    violation of the aforesaid provisions of the SEBI Act and IA Regulations in acting

    as unregistered investment advisors. Hence, the aforesaid submissions of the

    Noticees are untenable.

    14. The Noticees have also submitted that Noticee no. 2 had cleared investment

    advisor examination conducted by National Institute of Securities Market and

    applied before SEBI for grant of certificate of registration as an investment advisor

    under the proprietorship concern named ‘Capital Heed Financial Research’ and

    registration was granted by SEBI w.e.f. December 29, 2017 and hence, any

    violation that they may have committed in good faith during the period between

    August 2014 to February 2017 may be pardoned. In this regard, I note that

    proceedings were initiated by SEBI against Capital Heed Financial Research and

    its proprietor Mr. Shailendra Sen (Noticee no. 2) and vide SEBI Order dated June

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 15 of 20

    01, 2021, it was held that:

    “31. To sum up, I find that Mr. Shailendra Sen, when seeking registration from SEBI as an

    investment adviser in his individual capacity, was under a statutory obligation to disclose his prior

    activities in relation to the securities market including the unauthorized investor advisory activities

    undertaken by his partnership firm in true and correct sense to SEBI. However, it is now clear that

    he has knowingly made a false declaration in his application form for registration as investment

    adviser stating that he was not engaged in investment advisory services prior to filing his

    application thereby has intentionally furnished a false/misleading/wrong information to SEBI in

    violation of Clauses 1 and 8 of the Code of Conduct for investment adviser read with regulation

    15(9) of the IA Regulations. Moreover, the Noticee has also failed to disclose the fact of his earlier

    engagement in the activities of Cash Cow in the capacity of a partner of the said firm, even after the

    certificate of registration for Capital Heed was granted to him and such failure on the part of the

    Noticee to disclose such information which was not disclosed at the time of obtaining the

    registration has led to violation of regulation 13(b) of the IA Regulations. The aforesaid misconduct

    on the part of the Noticee has also amounted to violation of regulation 13(a) of the IA Regulations.

    At the same time, the Noticee has misrepresented to investors that it can provide PMS although it

    did not hold a certificate of registration from SEBI to do so, thereby violating regulation 3 of PMS

    Regulations, 1993.”

    15. From the above order, I note that Noticee no. 2 had made false declaration in his

    application form for registration as investment adviser under the proprietorship

    concern named ‘Capital Heed Financial Research’ before SEBI, stating that he

    was not engaged in investment advisory services prior to filing his application and

    thereby had intentionally furnished a false/misleading/wrong information to SEBI.

    Further, Noticee no. 2 had failed to disclose that it had engaged in investment

    advisory services as a partner of Cash Cow even after the certificate of registration

    for Capital Heed Financial Research was granted to him. I note that Noticee no. 2

    had tried to conceal its unregistered activities from SEBI and this shows that the

    conduct of the Noticee no. 2 has been dubious and not genuine. Therefore, grant

    of registration by SEBI to Noticee no. 2 on the basis of misrepresentation cannot

    be taken by Noticee no. 2 as mitigating factor to condone his unregistered

    investment advisory activities carried along with other Noticees herein. In view of

    such conduct, the contention of the Noticees that Noticee no. 2 had later obtained

    SEBI registration under the proprietorship concern named ‘Capital Heed Financial

    Research’ and any violation that they may have committed in good faith during the

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 16 of 20

    period between August 2014 to February 2017 may be pardoned is deplorable and

    therefore, untenable.

    16. The activities of the Noticees, as brought out from the various materials described

    above, seen in the backdrop of the aforesaid provisions show that the Noticees

    were holding themselves out and acting as an investment adviser for

    consideration. However, it is noted that the Cash Cow was not registered with

    SEBI in the capacity of Investment Advisor. Hence, I find that these activities/

    representations as being made by the Noticees without holding the certificate of

    registration as investment adviser are in violation of Section 12(1) of SEBI Act,

    1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.

    17. I note that in terms of Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 "Partnership" is

    the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business

    carried on by all or any of them acting for all”. Further, “Persons who have entered

    into partnership with one another are called individually, "partners" and collectively

    "a firm", and the name under which their business is carried on is called the "firm-

    name". Thus, the partnership firm is nothing but all the partners acting together.

    Therefore, Noticees no. 1 to 4 are in violation of Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992

    read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.

    18. From the bank account statement of the Noticees opened in the name of Cash

    Cow with ICICI Bank (A/c No. 657305500056 and 004105014315), Axis Bank (A/c

    No. 915020002699502) and Central Bank of India (A/c No. 3213140286), it is

    observed that the aforesaid bank accounts received in aggregate, total credits of

    Rs. 1,03,74,093/- during the period October 2015 to October 2017. I note that

    partnership firm i.e. Cash Cow, in whose name all these bank accounts were

    opened, had in the bank account opening forms indicated investment advisory

    service as its business activity. Therefore, it is reasonable to draw an inference

    that amounts credited in these bank accounts were towards investment advisory

    services rendered by the Noticees. Further, I note that the complainant Mr. Vikram

    Oswal has claimed that he had paid an amount of Rs. 10,000/- to the Noticees, for

    availing investment advisory services from the Noticees.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 17 of 20

    Directions:

    19. In view of the foregoing, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me

    under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B, read with of Section 19 of the SEBI Act,

    1992, hereby direct that:

    (i) The Noticees shall within a period of three months from the date of coming

    into force of this Order, jointly and severally, refund the money received

    from the clients/investors/complainant, as fees or consideration or in any

    other form, in respect of their unregistered investment advisory activities;

    (ii) The Noticees shall issue public notice in all editions of two National Dailies

    (one English and one Hindi) and in one local daily with wide circulation,

    detailing the modalities for refund, including the details of contact person

    such as names, addresses and contact details, within 15 days of coming

    into force of this Order;

    (iii) The repayments to the clients/investors shall be effected only through Bank

    Demand Draft or Pay Order or electronic fund transfer or through any other

    appropriate banking channels, which ensures audit trails to identify the

    beneficiaries of repayments;

    (iv) The Noticees are prevented from selling their assets, properties and holding

    of mutual funds/shares/securities held by them in demat and physical form

    except for the sole purpose of making the refunds as directed above;

    (v) ICICI Bank, Axis Bank and Central Bank of India wherein Cash Cow is

    holding accounts, are directed not to allow any debits/ withdrawals from and

    credits to the aforesaid accounts, except for debits for the purposes of the

    refunds as directed in para 19(i) above. ICICI Bank, Axis Bank and Central

    Bank of India are directed to ensure that all the above directions are strictly

    enforced;

    (vi) After completing the aforesaid repayments, the Noticees shall file a report of

    such completion with SEBI addressed to the Division Chief, CIS Division,

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 18 of 20

    Investment Management Department, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C4 A, G

    Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai – 400051, within a

    period of 15 days, after completion of three months from the coming into

    force of this order, duly certified by an independent Chartered Accountant.

    The restraint contained in para 19(iv) and (v) shall cease to operate once

    the refund to the investors is complete and the report as contemplated

    herein is filed;

    (vii) In case of failure of the Noticees to comply with the aforesaid directions in

    sub-para (i) and (vi) above, SEBI, on the expiry of the stipulated time period

    therein may recover the amounts mentioned in para 18 above or any other

    amount, as may be found to have been raised by the Noticees, from the

    Noticees, in accordance with Section 28A of the SEBI Act, 1992 including

    such other provisions contained in securities laws;

    (viii) The Noticee no. 2 is debarred from accessing the securities market, directly

    or indirectly and is prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in the

    securities market, directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever, for a

    period of 2 (two) years from the date of this order or till the expiry of 2 (two)

    years from the date of completion of refunds to investors as directed in

    paragraph 19(i) above, whichever is later. However, in view of the SEBI

    Order June 01, 2021 passed in the matter of M/s Capital Heed Financial

    Research (Proprietor Mr. Shailendra Sen) against Noticee no. 2, whereby

    debarment of 3 (three) years have been imposed on Noticee no. 2, the

    debarment passed vide this direction against Noticee no. 2, shall run

    concurrently with the debarment passed in the said Order dated June 01,

    2021;

    (ix) The Noticees no. 1, 3 and 4 are debarred from accessing the securities

    market, directly or indirectly and are prohibited from buying, selling or

    otherwise dealing in the securities market, directly or indirectly in any

    manner whatsoever, for a period of 1 (one) year from the date of this order

    or till the expiry of 1 (one) year from the date of completion of refunds to

    investors as directed in paragraph 19(i) above, whichever is later.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 19 of 20

    (x) The Noticee no. 2 is also restrained from associating with any company

    whose securities are listed on a recognized stock exchange and any

    company which intends to raise money from the public, or any intermediary

    registered with SEBI in any capacity for a period of 2 (two) years from the

    date of this order or till the expiry of 2 (two) years from the date of

    completion of refunds to investors as directed in paragraph 19(i) above,

    whichever is later;

    (xi) The Noticees no. 1, 3 and 4 are also restrained from associating with any

    company whose securities are listed on a recognized stock exchange and

    any company which intends to raise money from the public, or any

    intermediary registered with SEBI in any capacity for a period of 1 (one)

    year from the date of this order or till the expiry of 1 (one) year from the date

    of completion of refunds to investors as directed in paragraph 19(i) above,

    whichever is later; and

    (xii) The Noticees shall not undertake, either during or after the expiry of the

    period of debarment/restraint as mentioned in paragraph 19(viii) to (xi)

    above, either directly or indirectly, investment advisory services or any

    activity in the securities market without obtaining a certificate of registration

    from SEBI as required under the securities laws.

    20. The direction for refund, as given in paragraph 19(i) above, does not preclude the

    clients/investors to pursue the other legal remedies available to them under any

    other law, against the Noticees for refund of money or deficiency in service before

    any appropriate forum of competent jurisdiction.

    21. The order shall come into force with immediately, however, in view of the

    exceptional circumstances emerged due to the outbreak of a COVID-19 and

    consequential restrictions imposed in different parts of the country, the directions

    given in paragraph 19 except directions given in sub-paras 19(viii) to (xi), shall

    come into force within 30 days from the date of this order.

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking & Advisory Solutions

    Page 20 of 20

    22. A copy of this order shall be sent to the Noticees, recognized Stock Exchanges,

    the relevant banks, Depositories and Registrar and Transfer Agents of Mutual

    Funds to ensure that the directions given above are strictly complied with.

    Sd/-

    Place: Mumbai ANANTA BARUA

    Date: January 18, 2022 WHOLE TIME MEMBER

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Final Order in the matter of Cash Cow Broking and Advisory Solutions
    (Jan 18, 2022)