Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

    Swastik Safe Deposit And Investment Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - (8)(3)(1), Mumbai And Others

    1. The petitioner has challenged a notice of reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2011-12. The return filed by the petitioner for the said assessment year was accepted under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without scrutiny. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submitted that the reasons recorded by the assessing officer for issuing the notice lack validity. No income in case of the petitioner can be said to have escaped assessment. The notice of reopening is, therefore, bad in law.

    2. Learned counsel for the Revenue prayed for time to file reply. On his request, S.O to 21st December, 2018. By way of ad-interim relief, the impugned notice of reopening of the assessment is stayed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Swastik Safe Deposit... v. Assistant Commission...
    (Nov 30, 2018)