Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    VISHAL VASHISHT & OTHERS v. STATE OF DELHI & ANR.

    * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

    Date of Order: February 13, 2019

    + CRL.M.C. 793/2019 & Crl.M.As. 3221-22/2019 VISHAL VASHISHT & OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. D.Hasija, Advocate Versus

    STATE OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State

    CORAM:

    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

    O R D E R

    (ORAL)

    Petitioner has been charge-sheeted under Section 394/34 IPC in FIR No. 32/2011, registered at police station Rajinder Nagar, Central District, Delhi. Against the order on Charge, petitioner had preferred a Revision Petition, which was dismissed by the Revisional Court vide order of 20thDecember, 2018 as time-barred.

    Petitioner's counsel assails the impugned order of 9thDecember, 2014 on the ground that it discloses utter non-application of mind and the stand of petitioners has not been considered. It is submitted that no case under Section 394/34 IPC is made out and at best, the case made out against petitioner will come within the ambit of Section 323/34 IPC. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State supports the impugned order and submits that there is no infirmity in it.

    1

    Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order, I do find that it is a cryptic order but after hearing petitioner's counsel and going through the FIR of this case, this Court finds that prima facie case under Section 394/34 IPC is made out against petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed while not commenting upon the merits of the case, lest it may prejudice petitioner at trial.

    This petition and the applications are accordingly disposed of.

    (SUNIL GAUR)

    JUDGE

    FEBRUARY 13, 2019

    r

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    VISHAL VASHISHT & OTHERS v. STATE OF DELHI & ANR.
    (Feb 13, 2019)