AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The writ petition presents a distressing situation involving the forced marriage of minor girls, some not yet in their teens, to fully grown men. Photographic evidence appended to the petition illustrates the severity of the issue, including instances where the minor girls had to stand on chairs to garland their adult grooms. The court recognizes this practice as a form of cruelty that persists due to factors such as poverty, lack of education, cultural norms, and ignorance. The petition seeks judicial intervention to address and curtail this social evil. The procedural context culminates in the court constituting a Core Committee to investigate and recommend measures to eradicate and prevent the practice.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the forced marriage of minor girls constitutes a form of cruelty warranting judicial intervention.
  2. What measures can be effectively instituted to expose, prevent, and root out the practice of child marriage within society.
  3. Whether the constitution of a Core Committee is an appropriate mechanism to address the issue comprehensively.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court’s reasoning is grounded in the recognition of forced child marriage as an egregious social evil characterized by cruelty and injustice. Acknowledging the multifaceted causes such as poverty, ignorance, and cultural practices, the court emphasizes the necessity of proactive intervention. Rather than adjudicating on individual grievances alone, the court opts for a systemic approach by constituting a Core Committee. This Committee, chaired by a former Supreme Court judge and comprising senior government officials and child rights representatives, is entrusted with assessing the prevalence of child marriage, formulating strategies to eradicate the practice, and preventing future occurrences. The court directs the provision of adequate administrative and logistical support to the Committee to ensure its effective functioning and timely commencement of activities.

Holding and Implications

The court DISPOSED OF the writ petition by constituting a Core Committee tasked with addressing the issue of forced child marriage. The petitioner is permitted to bring any further grievances before this Committee in accordance with the law.

The direct effect of this decision is the establishment of a dedicated body with judicial endorsement to systematically combat child marriage in the relevant jurisdiction. The order does not set a new legal precedent but instead initiates an administrative mechanism aimed at social reform.

    Ms. Muthamma Devaya And Anr. v. The Union Of India And Ors.

    1. The narration of facts in the present writ petition is heart rendering. The photographs appended to the writ petition have been a cause of deep distress to us. The photographs reveal, the marriage of minor girls, not yet in their teens, to fully grown men. In one of the photographs, the girl has been made to stand on a chair, so that she could garland her tall and fully grown groom. Forced marriage of the girl child, one realizes, is one of the manifestations of cruelty, possibly without any equivalent comparison. It seems that the practice is common place in take part of the world. It may have remained unchecked for a variety of reasons including, poverty, lack of education, culture and ignorance. We are of the view that allowing the civil to continue without redressing it. Would make us a party to the disgraceful activity.

    2. As a first step, we feel a Core Committee needs to be constituted, which will expose the extent to which the practice is in vogue, it would suggest ways and means to root it out from our Society. And also, prevent it, to the extent possible, so that who have not. Fallen prey to it can be saved.

    3. Having been assisted by the learned counsel for the rival parties, we are satisfied, in constituting the following Core Committee, for the broad objectives narrated above.

    1. Hon'ble Dr. Justice Shivaraj V. Patil. Former Judge. Supreme Court of India - Chairman.

    2. The Secretary to Government. Department of Revenue, State of Karnataka-Ex-Officio Member.

    3. Secretary to Government, Department of Women and Child Welfare. State of Karnataka-Ex-Officio Member.

    4. Chairperson, Karnataka Child Rights Commission, Bangalore.- Ex-Officio Member above.

    The Director, Department of Women and Child Welfare, Government of Karnataka, shall assist the Committee as its Member-Secretary-. Needless to mention that Core Committee shall be competent to formulate its own procedure, as also, the area of its jurisdiction, around the broad objectives narrated.

    4. The Chairman of the Core Committee shall be provided with office accommodation; as also, Secretarial Staff in the same building in which, the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Karnataka has his office. The Chairman of the Core Committee shall be provided with adequate transport facilities, commensurate with the office held by him, as also, monthly remuneration ordinarily fixed for a retired Hon'ble Judge of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. The necessary Government Order, providing for the aforesaid facilities shall be issued, within one week from today. All the aforesaid facilities shall be made available, so as to ensure the commencement of activities at the hands of the Core Committee on or before 1.12.2010 A copy of the instant order be. Furnished to the learned counsel for the rival parties under the signature of the Court Officer attached to this Bench.

    5. With the constitution of Core committee, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. It shall be open to the petitioner to air all further grievances to the Core Committee, if the petitioner is so advised, in accordance with law.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ms. Muthamma Devaya And Anr. v. The Union Of India And Ors.
    (Nov 10, 2010)