Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Arun Kumar Sinha v. State Of Bihar

    Ravi Ranjan, J.:— Heard parties.

    2. This writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of 2nd A.C.P after completion of 24 years of satisfactory service in Grade-I with Grade Pay of Rs. 4800/- in the pay scale of Rs. 9300-34800/- which, according to him, is due since 6.07.2006

    3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that he has approached the District Education Officer, Nawada by filing a representation in this regard on 25.01.2016 (Annexure-2) but no decision has been taken as yet.

    4. Accordingly, this writ application is being disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Education Officer, Nawada once again by filing a detailed representation alongwith a copy of this order. Thereafter, the respondent no. 2 would be required to take a decision on its own merit and in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of representation.

    5. It is made clear that if the petitioner's claim is found tenable then consequential action should be taken within a further period of two months.

    6. It is also made clear that if the petitioner's claim is not found tenable then a reasoned order would be required to be passed and communicated by the authority concerned.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Arun Kumar Sinha v. State Of Bihar
    (Jan 19, 2017)