AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Janhavi Narendra Gikkwad Petitioner v. The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. S

    1. Not on board. Taken on production board in view of the urgency.

    2. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

    3. Considering the averments made in the petition and in view of the orders passed by this Court in similarly situated matters and also keeping in view the fact that the representation filed by the petitioner on 14th March, 2017 is pending with respondent nos. 3 and 4 and the same has not been yet decided, we direct respondent no. 3 and 4 to decide the said representation, taking into consideration the GR dated 1st March, 2014 and communication dated 4 June, 2016 issued by the Additional Secretary of Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six weeks from today.

    4. Petition stands disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Janhavi Narendra Gikkwad Petitioner v. The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. S
    (Mar 16, 2017)