AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • clause 5-A of the Sugar (Control) Order, 1996
  • Section 3(3-C)(a) of the Essential Commodities Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • clause 5-A of the Sugar (Control) Order, 1996
  • Section 3(3-C)(a) of the Essential Commodities Act

    Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd. And Another v. Union Of India And Others

    1. All these cases deal with determining the minimum price of levy sugar for the year 1982-83 in the zones of Central U.P and North Bihar. We have seen the additional affidavit dated 11-6-1998 filed by Shri Surendra Kumar, Joint Secretary, Government of India setting out the manner in which minimum price for levy sugar for 1982-83 had been determined. The very same determination of minimum price of levy sugar for the year 1982-83 was under challenge in Modi Industries Ltd. v. Union of India. A Bench of three Judges of this Court by their order dated 20-2-1996 after noting that the minimum cane price had been fixed for the year 1982-83 under Section 3(3-C)(a) of the Essential Commodities Act has also noticed that the additional cane price payable under clause 5-A of the Sugar (Control) Order, 1996 had not been taken into account nor was there any mopping up of excess realisation on free sale sugar while fixing the price of levy sugar for the year 1982-83. This Court has held that the matter was not covered by the decision of this Court in Shri Malaprabha Coop. Sugar Factory Ltd. v. Union of India (1994) 1 SCC 648 and had dismissed the transferred case. Our attention has been drawn to Shri Malaprabha Coop. Sugar Factory Ltd. v. Union of India (1997) 10 SCC 216. In para 13 of that decision this Court has expressly noted the decision in Transferred Case No. 9 of 1990 (supra) and has held that the first Shri Malaprabha case did not affect the Transferred Case (Civil) No. 9 of 1990. The decision in Transferred Case (Civil) No. 9 of 1990 is directly applicable to the present set of transferred cases which also deal with the same price fixed for the season 1982-83. In view thereof, these transferred cases are also dismissed.

    2. The respondents apply for extension of time for fixing the price of sugar under our order of 21-4-1998 pertaining to TCs (Civil) Nos. 18-20, 23-28, 30, 32-36 and 38-39 of 1993. The time is extended by six weeks from today.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd. And Another v. Union Of India And Others
    (Aug 19, 1998)