AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 11-AC
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 11-AC
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chandigarh-I v. Dabur India Ltd. And Another

    Order

    1. These appeals are filed against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT), at New Delhi dated 28-2-2003.

    2. The only question raised for our consideration is whether the Tribunal has power to reduce penalty under Section 11-AC. The Tribunal has held that this was not a fit case for imposition of penalty equivalent to the amount of duty and has reduced penalty to Rs 25,000.

    3. On the facts of this case we see no reason to interfere. We leave open the question whether the Tribunal has power to reduce penalty to be decided in an appropriate case.

    4. The appeals will accordingly stand dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chandigarh-I v. Dabur India Ltd. And Another
    (Apr 1, 2005)