AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Brizo Reality Company Private Ltd. Petitioner v. Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. & Others S

    1. The petitioner prays for following reliefs:

    (bi) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to deposit Rs. 6.50 Crores with The Registrar, High Court Bombay accrued interest against the claims made by the Enforcement Department, the Respondent No. 3 and the Respondent No. 5 in C.R No. 89 of 2013 and attachment order passed by the State Government of Maharashtra under sec. 4 of the mpid act and be pleased to direct that the attachment order passed by both these Authorities may be lifted on payment of Rs. 6.50 Crores accrued interest as directed by this Hon'ble Court.

    (b2) Interim and ad-interim relief in terms of prayer (b1) above be granted.

    2. Admittedly, the Appellate Tribunal is not functioning now. Learned Counsel appearing for respondents 2, 3 and 4 states that appropriate instructions would be taken in respect of the constitution of the Appellate Tribunal. The plea of the petitioner in respect of grant of prayer clause (bi)(bii) would be considered thereafter.

    3. Stand over to 28th April, 2016, to be listed under caption ‘fresh matters’.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Brizo Reality Company Private Ltd. Petitioner v. Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. & Others S
    (Apr 12, 2016)