Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This opinion is a brief procedural order. The court granted leave, heard counsel for the parties at length, concluded the hearing, and reserved judgment. The order further directs the learned counsel for the State of Maharashtra to produce the original file relating to proceedings conducted by the Hon’ble Chief Minister (as the Minister in charge of the relevant Department) while passing an order dated 21-3-2009.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The order reflects the court’s procedural management of the matter after concluding oral arguments and reserving judgment. The court directs production of the original governmental file connected to the proceedings leading to the order dated 21-3-2009, requiring the State of Maharashtra’s counsel to produce it within two weeks. No further reasoning or legal analysis is provided in the text.

Holding and Implications

ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF RECORD; JUDGMENT RESERVED.

The immediate effect is that the State of Maharashtra must produce, within two weeks, the original file of the proceedings referenced in connection with the order dated 21-3-2009. The court has reserved judgment after concluding the hearing; the text does not indicate any broader implications or any new legal principle being laid down.

    Ravi Yashwant Bhoir v. Collector

    Order

    1. Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. Hearing concluded. Judgment reserved.

    2. The learned counsel appearing for the State of Maharashtra is directed to produce the original file of the proceedings conducted by the Hon'ble Chief Minister as he was the Minister in charge of the Department while passing the order dated 21-3-2009, within two weeks.

    Court Masters

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ravi Yashwant Bhoir v. Collector
    (Feb 13, 2012)