Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Act of 1926.
  • article 20, schedule II of the Court Fees Act.
  • Indian Divorce Act and that article 20
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Act of 1926.
  • article 20, schedule II of the Court Fees Act.
  • Indian Divorce Act and that article 20

    Smurthwaite (Petitioner) v. Smurthwaite ().

    Bennet, J.:— This is a reference by the Taxing Officer on the question of what is the proper court fee for a petition for divorce under the Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Act of 1926. The stamp reporter reported that in such petitions a court fee of Rs. 20 had always been paid under article 20, schedule II of the Court Fees Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petition for divorce was not under the Indian Divorce Act and that article 20 only refers to a petition for divorce under the Indian Divorce Act. Learned counsel therefore contended that the proper court fee was Rs. 2. The Indian and Colonial Divorce jurisdiction Act is not merely an Act conferring jurisdiction on this Court but the Act further sets out in section 1, proviso (a), that the decree shall be granted only on grounds according to the law for the time being in force in England. The court therefore in hearing this petition does not apply the Indian Divorce Act and therefore the court fee applicable to the Indian Divorce Act cannot be applied to a petition under the Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Act of 1926. For these reasons I consider that the report of the stamp reporter is incorrect. I hold that the proper court fee of Rs. 2 has been paid in this case and therefore the petition should proceed. I do not think that a notice should issue to the Government Advocate.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Smurthwaite (Petitioner) v. Smurthwaite ().
    (May 1, 1935)