Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Chidambaram Chettiar v. Srinivasa Sastrial And Others

    Lord Moulton:-

    Their Lordships are of opinion that the two decisions appealed against are correct; that the High Court acted rightly in setting aside the two assignments, the one to Annamalai and the other to Chidambaram, and that no valid proceedings can therefore be based on either of those assignments. The question whether any of the parties can establish rights based, not on the assignments, but on other grounds, such as the actual payment of debts, is a point which was, in their Lordships' opinion, not before the Courts below, and is not before their Lordships, and on that point therefore they pronounce no opinion.

    Their Lordships will, therefore, humbly advise His Majesty that these appeals should be dismissed.

    Appeals dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Chidambaram Chettiar v. Srinivasa Sastrial And Others
    (Mar 4, 1914)