Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Ashok Thapar v. Supreme Indosaigon Associates

    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. In spite of service of notice, nobody has entered appearance on behalf of the respondents to contest the prayer made in this appeal.

    By the impugned order, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [for short "the National Commission"], after declining the appellant's prayer for permission to file a petition for amendment of the complaint, proceeded to dismiss the same. In our view, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the National Commission should have, instead of dismissing the complaint at the admission stage, granted time to the appellant to file a petition for amendment of the complaint.

    Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the National Commission, which shall now give opportunity to the appellant to file a petition for amendment of the complaint and, thereafter, proceed to decide the same in accordance with law.

    ......................J.

    [B.N. AGRAWAL] ......................J.

    [G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, May 11, 2009.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ashok Thapar v. Supreme Indosaigon Associates
    (May 11, 2009)