Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Ram Kishan v. Raj Kumar

    Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

    Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondent-State states that the respondents have complied with the directions issued by this Court. Accordingly, they have prepared the seniority list and intimated to the petitioner his position in the seniority and have also prepared the Register as directed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, disputes the said submission.

    Considering the dispute, in our view, the contempt proceeding is not the proper remedy. If respondents have not followed the directions, it would be open to the petitioner to file fresh petition for the remaining grievance.

    Hence, this petition for initiation contempt proceedings is dismissed. Contempt Notice discharged.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ram Kishan v. Raj Kumar
    (Aug 18, 2003)