AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1993 INSC 110
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Article 32 of the Constitution of India
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1993 INSC 110
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Article 32 of the Constitution of India
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The National Federation of Blind filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India before the Supreme Court. The petition sought a mandamus directing the Union of India and the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) to: (a) allow visually handicapped candidates to compete for the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) and allied Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ services, and (b) permit such candidates to write the Civil Services Examination either in Braille script or with the assistance of a scribe. The Federation also asked that Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts already identified for the visually handicapped be filled on a preferential basis.

During earlier policy deliberations, a Standing Committee set up by the Ministry of Welfare had identified 420 categories of Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts suitable for persons with disabilities, including the visually impaired. The Government of India accepted this report through an Office Memorandum dated 25 November 1986 but had not, by the time of the petition, implemented the preference or reservation scheme. The present judgment resolves the specific prayer concerning access to the Civil Services Examination.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether visually handicapped (blind and partially blind) candidates are entitled to sit for and write the Civil Services Examination conducted by the UPSC.
  2. Whether such candidates are legally entitled to use Braille script or a scribe while taking the examination.

Arguments of the Parties

Petitioner (National Federation of Blind)

  • Despite the 1986 Office Memorandum accepting job identification for the visually handicapped, no effective implementation had occurred in seven years.
  • Visually handicapped persons can perform administrative duties with equal efficiency, as demonstrated by counsel’s own performance before the Court.
  • Denying blind candidates the opportunity to take the Civil Services Examination violates their right to equality and ignores the availability of suitable posts identified by the Government’s own committee.

Respondents (Union of India & UPSC)

  • An affidavit by the Ministry of Personnel stated that posts identified for the blind were allegedly not those filled through the competitive examination conducted by the UPSC.
  • Implementation of preference or reservation for the handicapped in Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts was still under governmental consideration.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court noted that the Government’s own Standing Committee had identified 420 Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts suitable for persons with disabilities, many of which are ordinarily filled through the Civil Services Examination. Consequently, the UPSC’s assertion that no identified posts required such an examination was rejected as factually incorrect.

Recognising that “seeing, reading, writing and movement” are essential for most government jobs, the Court nevertheless found that modern aids—such as reader’s allowance, typing skills, Braille, and scribes—enable visually handicapped persons to discharge these functions effectively. Thus, there was “no ground to deprive them of their right to compete for those posts along with other candidates.”

The Court confined its decision to examination access, expressly stating that once recruited, visually handicapped officers would not have an automatic right to promotion to posts whose physical requirements they could not meet.

Holding and Implications

PARTLY ALLOWED. The Supreme Court directed the Government of India and the UPSC to permit eligible visually handicapped candidates to compete in the Civil Services Examination, allowing them to write the examination in Braille or with the help of a scribe. No order as to costs.

Implications: The ruling immediately opens the Civil Services Examination to blind and partially blind candidates with appropriate accommodations, thereby enhancing equal employment opportunity in top civil services. The Court did not create a reservation policy; it instead urged the Government to decide that broader question “as expeditiously as possible.”

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    National Federation Of Blind v. Union Public Service Commission And Others

    Kuldip Singh, J.— National Federation of Blind — a representative body of visually handicapped persons in India — has filed this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Union of India and the Union Public Service Commission to permit the blind candidates to compete for the Indian Administrative Service and the Allied Services and further to provide them the facility of writing the civil services examination either in Braille-script or with the help of a Scribe. Braille is a system of writing for the blind in which the characters consist of raised dots to be read by the fingers. Further relief sought in the petition is that Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts in Government and public sector undertakings which have already been identified for the visually handicapped persons be offered to them on preferential basis.

    2. The visually handicapped constitute a significant section of our-society and as such it is necessary to encourage their participation in every walk of life. The Ministry of Welfare, Government of India has been undertaking various measures to utilise the potentialities of the visually handicapped persons. The Central as well as the State Governments have launched several schemes to educate, train and provide useful employment to the handicapped. The Central Government has provided reservations to the extent of 3% vacancies in Group ‘C’ and ‘D’ posts for the physically handicapped including blind and partially blind.

    3. There has been a growing demand from the visually handicapped persons to provide reservations for them in Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts under the Central Government. The Ministry of Welfare, Government of India has a standing committee for identification of jobs in various Ministries/Departments and public sector undertakings for the physically handicapped. By an order dated December 30, 1985 the Government of India directed the standing committee to undertake the identification of jobs for the handicapped in Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ services under the Government and public sector undertakings.

    4. The committee submitted its report which was published on October 31, 1986. Copy of the report has been placed on the record of this petition. In the introduction to the report given by Mr M.C Narasimhan, Joint Secretary to Government of India and Chairman, standing committee on identification of jobs for handicapped, it has been stated as under:

    “A sub-committee, which was set up to assist the standing committee visited a large number of public sector undertakings and observed people actually working in a variety of jobs and the working conditions in which these jobs are performed. The sub-committee had detailed discussions with the Chiefs and senior officers of the public sector undertakings as also with officers of the Central Government Departments. A list of the public sector undertakings and the list of the officers of the undertakings with whom the sub-committee had discussions is annexed to the report. The committee after detailed discussions and on-the-spot study has prepared a comprehensive list of 416 categories in Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts in Government offices and public sector undertakings, with their jobs descriptions, the physical requirement of each group of job and matched them with various categories of disabilities.”

    5. The committee devoted special attention to the visually handicapped. Para 8 of the report which relates to the blind is as under:

    “However, in the case of the blind the position is somewhat different. Seeing, reading, writing and movement are essential ingredients of most Government jobs. Therefore, a similar approach in respect of blind persons may be difficult. It would not be possible to generalise that blind persons can do most jobs as we have found for those with locomotor and hearing disabilities. The committee found that in higher posts in Government the help of a personal assistant or a stenographer is generally available. But this facility is not available even in higher posts in public sector undertakings. Wherever this facility is available a blind person may not find it difficult, in certain groups of posts, to handle the job. It is also possible, in relation to other posts where stenographic assistance is not available that some other facilities can be provided to a blind employee. To compensate ‘reading deficiency’, readers' allowance can be provided to blind employees to enable them to engage a reader. Similarly, to compensate for ‘writing deficiency’, the blind employee should be required to know typing. Adequate knowledge of typing should be prescribed as an essential qualification for blind employees for public employment. Where mobility may also be one of the main ingredients of a job it is difficult to compensate blind employees for this ‘deficiency’. The committee would also emphasise that the blind employee should be fully responsible for the duties assigned to them, despite the provision of reader's allowance and typing skill. The committee would also suggest that the maximum reader's allowance should be limited to Rs 200 p.m to blind employees recruited to Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ post.”

    6. The committee has identified about 416 categories of Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts which are suitable for the handicapped. The committee has further specified that the visually handicapped (blind and partially blind) are suitable for appointment to the following categories of Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts:

    No. in the list annexed to the report Category of post Group 178 to 187 Hindi Officers ‘A’ & ‘B’ 191 to 192 Job Analyst ‘A’ & ‘B’ 193 to 199 Labour Welfare Officers ‘A’ & ‘B’ 200 to 209 Law Officers ‘A’ & ‘B’ 237 to 242 Personal Assistants ‘B’ 243 to 256 Personnel Officers ‘A’ & ‘B’ 279 to 291 Public Relations Officers ‘A’ & ‘B’ 295 to 317 Research Officers ‘A’ & ‘B’ 354 to 363 Training Officers ‘A’ & ‘B’ 364 to 376 Administrative Officer (Non-Secretarial) ‘A’ 377 to 384 Administrative Officers (Secretarial-Senior) ‘A’ 385 to 401 Administrative Officers (Secretarial-Junior) ‘A’ & ‘B’ 409 Asstt. Admin. Officer ‘A’ & ‘B’

    7. We have only quoted the list of categories from the report to illustrate the point that the committee appointed by the Government has in its report identified certain categories of posts to which the blind and the partially blind can be appointed.

    8. Government of India through Ministry of Personnel issued office memorandum dated November 25, 1986 wherein it accepted the report of the committee and took a policy decision that in respect of the posts identified by the committee the handicapped persons shall be given preference in the matter of recruitment to those posts. The office memorandum is reproduced hereunder:

    “No. F. 36034/4/86-Estt. (SCT)

    Government of India

    Ministry of Personnel, Public

    Grievances & Pensions

    Department of Personnel & Training

    . . . . .

    New Delhi, the 25th November, 1986

    Office Memorandum

    Subject: Identification of jobs for the physically handicapped persons in Groups ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts filed by direct recruitment in the Central Government services and public sector undertakings.
    The undersigned is directed to say that with a view to effecting optimum utilisation of potentialities of physically handicapped which constitutes a significant section of the population in the country, the Ministry of Welfare constituted a standing committee for identification of jobs for the physically handicapped in the Central Government services and public sector undertakings. The standing committee on identification of jobs set up a sub-committee for on-the-spot identification of jobs for the physically handicapped persons in Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts after making an in-depth study of undertakings as well as in consultation with the concerned authorities. This sub-committee in its report (submitted to the parent committee) identified 420 jobs in Group ‘A’ and Group ‘B’ posts/services along with the physical requirements and functional classifications of disabilities indicating what jobs can be held by each category of disabled people and with what disability.
    It has been decided that in respect of identified posts which can be held by physically handicapped persons preferences to physically handicapped persons will be given in the matter of recruitment to those posts. A copy of the report of the committee referred to in Para 1 is enclosed for information guidance and necessary action. The list of jobs identified by the committee as suitable for being held by physically handicapped persons is not exhaustive. The Ministries/Departments can further supplement the list based on their knowledge for jobs requirements, essential qualifications etc.
    The Ministries/Departments after identifying all the posts which can be held by physically handicapped persons may inform the UPSC at the time of sending their requisitions for filling vacancies in respect of those posts, that preference is to be given to physically handicapped persons in the matter of recruitment. The UPSC have agreed in principle to give preference to physically handicapped persons in filling the identified posts. The Department of Personnel and Training will be issuing general instructions to enable preference being given to the physically handicapped persons in such cases.
    The Ministry of Finance etc. are requested to bring these instructions to the notice of all concerned.
    Sd/-
    (Bata K. Dey)
    Director (JCA)”

    From the office memorandum quoted above it is obvious that the Government of India has taken the following policy decisions to implement the committee report:

    (1) The Government of India has taken cognizance of the fact that the standing committee on identification of jobs through its sub-committee has identified 420 jobs in Group ‘A’ and Group ‘B’ posts/services along with the physical requirements and functional classifications of disabilities indicating what jobs can be held by each category of disabled people and with what disability.

    (2) The decision has been taken that in respect of identified posts which can be held by physically handicapped persons preference to physically handicapped persons will be given in the matter of recruitment to those posts.

    (3) The list of jobs identified by the committee is not exhaustive, the ministries/departments can further supplement the list based on their knowledge of job requirements, essential qualifications etc.

    (4) The ministries/departments after identifying all the posts which can be held by physically handicapped persons may inform the Union Public Service Commission at the time of sending their requisitions for filling vacancies in respect of those posts, that preference is to be given to physically handicapped persons in the matter of recruitment.

    (5) The Union Public Service Commission has agreed in principle to give preference to physically handicapped persons in filling identified posts.

    (6) The Department of Personnel and Training will be issuing general instructions to enable preference being given to the physically handicapped persons in such cases.

    9. Mr S.K Rungta, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the memorandum dated November 25, 1986 was issued more than seven years back but so far the decisions taken therein have not been implemented. Mr Rungta — (himself visually handicapped) has argued his case with utmost clarity. Mr Rungta was fully conversant with all the relevant annexures to the petition. He referred to the relevant pages in the bulky paper-book with perfect ease. We did not feel even for a moment that the case was being argued by a visually handicapped lawyer. Mr Rungta's performance before us amply proves the point that the visually handicapped persons can perform the jobs entrusted to them with equal efficiency.

    10. The question of giving preference to the handicapped in the matter of recruitment to the identified posts is a matter for the Government of India to decide. The matter is pending for decision with the Government of India for the last several years. While appreciating various measures undertaken by the Government to provide useful employment to the handicapped persons we commend the Government of India to decide the question of providing preference/reservation to the handicapped in Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts as expeditiously as possible.

    11. So far as the claim of visually handicapped for writing the civil services examinations, in Braille-script or with the help of Scribe, is concerned, we are of the view that their demand is legally justified.

    12. The list of Category ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts, identified as suitable for the visually handicapped by the committee, includes number of posts which are filled as a result of the civil services examinations. When there are posts to which blind and partially blind can be appointed, we see no ground to deprive them of their right to compete for those posts along with other candidates belonging to general category.

    13. Mr V.K Cherian, Under Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Personnel in his affidavit dated March 10, 1992 filed before this Court has stated as under:

    ”If there were Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ jobs, which could be filled up by the blind, the same should also be identified. Once the jobs were identified, they could be filled up from among the blind and also other handicapped persons such as deaf and orthopaedically handicapped …. Going by the report of the committee and the posts identified by it, the Union Public Service Commission made the observation that the posts identified as suitable to be held by the physically handicapped persons, particularly those identified for the blind are not such which are required to be filled on the basis of competitive examination conducted by the Commission.”

    The observations of the Union Public Service Commission as projected by Mr V.K Cherian in his above-quoted affidavit do not seem to be correct. After going through the list of the posts identified as suitable for visually handicapped (blind and partially blind) it is obvious that there are number of posts which are required to be filled through the civil services examination and other competitive examinations conducted by the Commission. Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ posts in the category of Administrative Officers (Secretarial-Senior) and Administrative Officer (Secretarial-Junior) are necessarily to be filled as a result of civil services examination by the Union Public Service Commission. If some of the posts in the Indian Administrative Service and other Allied Services, as identified by the committee, can be filled from amongst the visually handicapped persons then we see no reason why they should not be permitted to sit and write the civil services examination. We make it clear that once recruited to the lowest level of the service the visually handicapped persons shall not be entitled to claim promotion to the higher posts in the service irrespective of the physical requirements of the jobs. If in the hierarchy of promotional posts it is found by the Government that a particular post is not suitable for the visually handicapped person he shall not have any right to claim the said post.

    14. In the light of the above discussion we partly allow the writ petition and direct the Government of India and the Union Public Service Commission to permit the visually handicapped (blind and partially blind) eligible candidates to compete and write the civil services examination which is ordinarily held yearly by the Union Public Service Commission. We further direct that they shall be permitted to write the examination in Braille-script or with the help of a Scribe. There shall be no orders as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    National Federation Of Blind v. Union Public Service Commission And Others
    (Mar 23, 1993)