AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Luxmi Devi Sugar Mills P. Ltd.

    1. The following question arises in the present appeals :

    Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in disallowing the interest of Rs. 46,510 and Rs. 52,429 payable under the U. P. Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961, for the assessee's failure to pay the cane cess and purchase tax for the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71, respectively ?

    2. The aforesaid question was answered by the High Court in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The view taken by the High Court is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. v. CIT . The appeals fail and are, accordingly, dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Luxmi Devi Sugar Mills P. Ltd.
    (Sep 14, 1990)