Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section [not specified], Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Registration and Processing of Claims) Act, 1985
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section [not specified], Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Registration and Processing of Claims) Act, 1985
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This document reflects a court order. The provided text contains no factual background or procedural history.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The order provides no accompanying reasoning or analytical discussion in the provided text. The basis for the court’s decision is not discernible from the record supplied.

Holding and Implications

ORDER ISSUED

The direct effect of the order on the parties cannot be determined from the provided text. No broader implications are discussed, and no new precedent appears to be set.

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Union Carbide Corporation (Ii) v. Union Of India .

    1. Having considered the circumstance that various proceedings are pending in this Court in relation to the Bhopal Gas Disaster which have an important bearing on the settlement between the Union of India and the Union Carbide Corporation embodied in our order dated 14-2-1989 read with our order dated 15-2-19891, including the writ petitions challenging the vires of the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Registration and Processing of Claims) Act, 1985 which question the right of the Union of India to the terms of our order dated 14-2-1989, consequential orders, including orders on the affidavits of John Macdonald dated 31-3-1989 and C.P Lal dated 3-4-1989 filed by the Union Carbide Corporation and the Union Carbide India Ltd. respectively, in these appeals and in the suit are deferred and it is ordered that the Union Carbide Corporation will continue to be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts in India until further orders.

    2. During the course of argument before us, it transpired that allegations have been made in some of the documents filed before us that attempts were made to settle the dispute between the Union Carbide Corporation and the Union of India in respect of compensation to be paid to the victims involved in the Bhopal Gas Disaster at US 350 million dollars and towards the expenses of the Government in the sum of US 100 million dollars. It seems necessary that the Union of India and the Union Carbide Corporation should file respective affidavits indicating the precise terms of the proposals made from time to time outside the court in regard to the settlement of the claims. The affidavit of the Union of India shall contain specific details in regard to the quantum of compensation, the time-frame for payment, and other particulars suggested in the proposals and mentioning specifically the persons concerned who suggested the quantum and particulars and/or were concerned in the negotiations, whether belonging to the Government or otherwise. The Union of India will keep ready in its possession all the relevant documents on the basis of which the averments are made in the affidavit filed by it, so that such documents may be produced as and when this Court calls upon the said Union of India to do so before it.

    3. Three weeks are allowed to the Union of India and the Union Carbide Corporation for filing the aforesaid affidavits. The matters will now come up on 2-5-1989 for further orders.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Union Carbide Corporation (Ii) v. Union Of India .
    (Apr 5, 1989)