AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5, Subsection 2 of the 1983 Income Tax Act
  • Section 14(1) proviso (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5, Subsection 2 of the 1983 Income Tax Act
  • Section 14(1) proviso (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act

    Ram Pyari (Smt) And Others v. Daya Rani (Smt) And Others

    1. Special leave is granted.

    2. This is one of the usual cases in which leave to contest an application filed by the respondents for eviction under Section 14(1) proviso (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act was refused by learned Rent Controller on the grounds which are wholly untenable. The case is fully covered by the ratio of the decision of this Court in Precision Steel & Engineering Works v. Prem Deva Niranjan Deva Tayal (1982) 3 SCC 270, AIR 1982 SC 1518. Consequently, the appeal will have to be allowed. We accordingly allow this appeal, set aside the order of the Rent Controller as well as the order of the High Court and grant leave to contest the petition for eviction. We remit the matter back to the Rent Controller with a direction to decide it according to law and the hearing of the matter will be expedited. There will be no order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ram Pyari (Smt) And Others v. Daya Rani (Smt) And Others
    (Dec 10, 1982)