Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Acts
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Acts
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This opinion arises from a miscellaneous appeal against the judgment dated 12.4.1989 of the Family Court, Jaipur, concerning an application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by the respondent, Smt. Rashida, against the husband-appellant. The Family Court had ordered the appellant to pay monthly maintenance to the respondent and their minor daughter for specified periods. The Family Court concluded that a divorce had occurred between the parties effective 12.11.1986 and accordingly ceased maintenance payments to the respondent-wife after that date.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the maintenance amount under Section 125 Cr.P.C. should be payable from the date of the order or the date of the application.
  2. Whether the Family Court provided adequate reasons for ordering maintenance payments to commence from the date of the application rather than the date of the order.
  3. Whether the maintenance payments to the minor daughter should also commence from the date of the order instead of the date of the application.

Arguments of the Parties

Appellant's Arguments

  • The maintenance amount should have been ordered from the date of the order and not from the date of the application.
  • The Family Court failed to assign reasons for commencing maintenance payments to the respondent-wife from the date of application till the date of divorce.
  • Similarly, maintenance for the minor daughter should have been ordered from the date of the order, not the application.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court examined Section 125 Cr.P.C., particularly Sub-section 2, which permits maintenance payments to be ordered from either the date of the order or the date of the application if reasons are provided. The Family Court had previously disposed of the application on 6.9.1986, ordering maintenance payable from 26.9.1986, but later remanded the case and ordered payments from the date of application, 3.6.1985. The appellate court found no justification for ordering maintenance from the application date and held that the proper commencement date should have been 26.9.1986, as per the earlier order.

Holding and Implications

The Court partly allowed the miscellaneous appeal and modified the Family Court’s order. It held that the appellant shall pay Rs. 150/- per month to the respondent-wife from 26.9.1986 to 12.11.1986. For the minor daughter, Rs. 75/- per month shall be payable from 26.9.1986 to 12.11.1986, and thereafter Rs. 100/- per month until she is married or attains majority. This decision corrects the commencement date for maintenance payments but does not establish any new precedent beyond the application of Section 125 Cr.P.C. as interpreted in this case.

    Qamruddin v. Rashida

    1.We have heard the learned Counsel for the husband-appellant in this misc. appeal arising out of the judgment dt. 12.4.89 of the learned Judge Family Court Jaipur passed on an application Under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code preferred before him by the respondent Smt. Rashida.

    2. In the impugned judgment the learned Judge Family Court has ordered that the appellant shall pay Rs. 150/-per month to the respondent from 3.6.1985 to 12.11.86. It has also been ordered by the learned Judge Family Court that for the minor daughter the appellant shall pay a sum of Rs. 75/- p.m. from 3.6.1985 to 12.11.1986 and thereafter a sum of Rs. 100/- p.m. till the minor daughter is married or attain majority.

    3. It will appear from the aforesaid judgment of the learned Family Court that he came to the conclusion that there was divorce between the parties in accordance with the Muslim Law w.e.f. 12.11.1986 and for that reason he has not awarded any amount of maintenance of the respondent-wife after that date.

    4. In challenge to the aforesaid judgment, the learned Counsel for the appellant has contended that Under Section 125 generally the amount should have been ordered to be paid from the date of order and not from the date of application. He contends that no reason has been assigned by the learned Judge Family Court as to why the payment of the maintenance so far as respondent was concerned should be from the date of the application till the date of the divorce. He also contends that similarly also so far as the minor daughter is concerned, the payment should have been ordered from the date of order and not from the date of the application.

    5. A bare reading of Section 125 Cr.P.C. and more so Sub-section 2 will show that the allowance shall be payable from the date of the order or if so ordered, from the date of the application for maintenance. Therefore, if the Court feels that the amount of maintenance should be ordered from the date of application there should be some reasons for ordering so. On the earlier occasion i.e. 6.9.86 when the learned Judge Family Court had disposed of the application Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and had ordered that the amount of maintenance shall be payable w.e.f. 26.9.86. The case was remanded back to the Family Court and the learned Judge Family Court ordered that the amount of maintenance shall be payable from 3.6.85 i.e. the date of application We are of the opinion that there was no reason why in this case the amount should have been paid from the date of the application and the proper date could have been 26.9.86 on earlier occasion when the learned Judge Family Court disposed of the case.

    6. Consequently, we hereby partly allow this misc. appeal and modify the order of the learned Judge Family Court with the extent that amount at Rs. 150/- p.m. as maintenance to the respondent-wife shall be payable from 26.9.86 upto 12.11.86. So far as minor-daughter is concerned, Rs. 75/- shall be payable from 26.9.86 to 12.11.86 the date of divorce and thereafter Rs. 100/- p.m. either she is married or she attains majority.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Qamruddin v. Rashida
    (Dec 16, 1991)