Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1968
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1968

    Jai Singh v. The State Of H.P And Others

    1. The petitioner is a resident of village Saryala, situated in Jagjitnagar block, tehsil and district Solan. He is aggrieved by the elections held in Gram Sabha, Chandi. He contends that the Gram Sabha area of that Gram Sabha was altered and consequently the Gram Sabha itself stood abolished. According to him, the Gram Sabha should have been constituted afresh in respect of the altered area, and as there was no fresh constitution of the Gram Sabha the action taken to hold elections to the Executive Committees consequent to the notification dated September 29, 1972 must be treated as invalid. By this writ petition the petitioner prays for relief against the elections in respect of the Gram Sabha, Chandi.

    2. The writ petition is without force.

    3. Any change in the Gram Sabha area over which the existing Gram Sabha has jurisdiction does not affect the constitution of the Gram Sabha itself. Section 5 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1968 contemplates a Gram Sabha as a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal. Its jurisdiction in respect of a Sabha area is defined under Section 4 of the Act. The Government is empowered under that section to include or exclude any area from the Sabha area. Merely because the extent of the Sabha area over which the Gram Sabha has jurisdiction is altered under Section 4 does not mean that the Gram Sabha in its nature is affected in any way. The contention of the petitioner must fail.

    4. The writ petition is dismisses with costs.

    5. Petition dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Jai Singh v. The State Of H.P And Others
    (Sep 19, 1975)