Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Ams Jewellers v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And

    1. By this petition, the petitioner, inter alia, has prayed as under:

    "(a) to direct the respondents to release entire jewellery worth Rs. 52,10,120 in terms of proviso to Section 132(1)(iii) of the Act, or in any case, to release jewellery worth Rs. 39,53,726 which is being retained illegally without any justification over and above the total liability created under the block assessment."

    2. It is an admitted position that Settlement Commission under the IT Act, 1961, is seized of the matter and an application is also submitted to the Settlement Commission for return of the jewellery. The petitioner's grievance is that the Settlement Commission is not deciding the matter, and looking to the value of the jewellery and the amount which is lying with Department, nothing is required to be recovered so far as the jewellery aspect is concerned, 3, Our attention was drawn by the learned counsel to Section 245F with regard to powers and procedure of Settlement Commission and also to the proviso to 132(1)(iii). We are not entering into the merits of the case but looking to the aforesaid provisions, we direct the Settlement Commission to decide the application submitted by the present petitioner for return of the jewellery within a period of three weeks.

    With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ams Jewellers v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And
    (Jan 29, 2004)