Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bipinali Textiles Pvt. Ltd.

    Sujata V. Manohar, J.:— The respondent carries on the activity of giving physical twisting under mechanical process and chemicals, to fiat yarn supplied to it by textile mills. It, therefore, manufactures twisted yarn out of flat yarn supplied to it. The Central Board of Direct Taxes, vide its circular dated November 22, 1985, which is referred to in paragraph 4 of the Tribunal's order dated April 2, 1987, has clarified that the activities of twisting and crimping of yarn are also to be treated as manufacturing activities. These instructions are binding on the Department. Hence, the questions are academic. No referable question of law, therefore, arises. The application is dismissed and the rule is discharged.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bipinali Textiles Pvt. Ltd.
    (Aug 10, 1990)