Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

trial-court& Case Commentaries

Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified): Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green (and Philmon Chambers)

Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified): Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green (and Philmon Chambers)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified) Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green...
United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members

United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members

Date: Oct 27, 2025
United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members...
Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025)

Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025) United States v. Acebo, No. 24-8035 (10th Cir. Oct. 23, 2025) —...
Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A)

Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A) Case: Eva Migliore v. Vision Solar LLC, et al. (Sunlight Financial...
Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket

Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket Note: The opinion is designated “Not Precedential,” but...
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols Introduction In...
Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases

Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases United States v. Aaric Murray and Richard Kirkland Johnson, No. 23‑4328 & 23‑4331...
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting

United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting

Date: Oct 27, 2025
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Hall v. Nassau County: Standing for Systemic Tax-Assessment Challenges and Venue Transfer for Countywide Juror Interest

Hall v. Nassau County: Standing for Systemic Tax-Assessment Challenges and Venue Transfer for Countywide Juror Interest

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Hall v. Nassau County: Standing for Systemic Tax-Assessment Challenges and Venue Transfer for Countywide Juror Interest Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Department (Barros,...
Second Department Clarifies Limits on Trial Subpoenas in Fiduciary Accountings and Reaffirms Prudent‑Investor Deference for Intra‑Family Trust/GRAT Transactions

Second Department Clarifies Limits on Trial Subpoenas in Fiduciary Accountings and Reaffirms Prudent‑Investor Deference for Intra‑Family Trust/GRAT Transactions

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Second Department Clarifies Limits on Trial Subpoenas in Fiduciary Accountings and Reaffirms Prudent‑Investor Deference for Intra‑Family Trust/GRAT Transactions Case: Matter of Cheryl LaBella...
Primary-Use Gatekeeping Under RPTL 420-a: Member-Only Social Functions Defeat Exemption Despite Cultural Mission

Primary-Use Gatekeeping Under RPTL 420-a: Member-Only Social Functions Defeat Exemption Despite Cultural Mission

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Primary-Use Gatekeeping Under RPTL 420-a: Member-Only Social Functions Defeat Exemption Despite Cultural Mission Case: Matter of Germania of Poughkeepsie, Inc. v. Town of Poughkeepsie Citation: 2025...
People v. Lewis: Protective Frisks Stop at the Pat‑Down; Federal Harmless‑Error Standard Requires New Trial on Robbery‑Related Counts

People v. Lewis: Protective Frisks Stop at the Pat‑Down; Federal Harmless‑Error Standard Requires New Trial on Robbery‑Related Counts

Date: Oct 27, 2025
People v. Lewis: Protective Frisks Stop at the Pat‑Down; Federal Harmless‑Error Standard Requires New Trial on Robbery‑Related Counts Introduction In People v. Lewis (2025 NY Slip Op 05823), the...
Slater v. Ichtertz: Res Ipsa Loquitur Permitted for Intraoperative Nerve Injury; No “Tensile‑Strength” Prerequisite for Med‑Mal Expert Opinions

Slater v. Ichtertz: Res Ipsa Loquitur Permitted for Intraoperative Nerve Injury; No “Tensile‑Strength” Prerequisite for Med‑Mal Expert Opinions

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Res Ipsa Loquitur Permitted for Intraoperative Nerve Injury; No “Tensile‑Strength” Prerequisite for Med‑Mal Expert Opinions Case: Slater v. Ichtertz, 320 Neb. 159 (Neb. Oct. 24, 2025) Court: Supreme...
No Per Se Office Disqualification When Prosecutor’s Relative Is a DHHS Witness: Conflicts Are Personal Under § 23-1205

No Per Se Office Disqualification When Prosecutor’s Relative Is a DHHS Witness: Conflicts Are Personal Under § 23-1205

Date: Oct 25, 2025
No Per Se Office Disqualification When Prosecutor’s Relative Is a DHHS Witness: Conflicts Are Personal Under § 23-1205 Introduction In State ex rel. Condon v. Braaten, 320 Neb. 214 (Neb. Oct. 24,...
No Presumption of Credit for Time Under Temporary Suspension: Nebraska Supreme Court Disbars Elected County Attorney for Misuse of Office and Repeated DUIs

No Presumption of Credit for Time Under Temporary Suspension: Nebraska Supreme Court Disbars Elected County Attorney for Misuse of Office and Repeated DUIs

Date: Oct 25, 2025
No Presumption of Credit for Time Under Temporary Suspension: Nebraska Supreme Court Disbars Elected County Attorney for Misuse of Office and Repeated DUIs Introduction In State ex rel. Counsel for...
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies: A Certificate of Innocence Requires Proving Innocence of Every Offense Charged—Including Nol-Prossed Counts from Plea Deals

Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies: A Certificate of Innocence Requires Proving Innocence of Every Offense Charged—Including Nol-Prossed Counts from Plea Deals

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Certificates of Innocence Now Require Proof of Innocence of Every Offense Charged—even Nol-Prossed Counts Executive Summary In People v. Reed, 2025 IL 130595 (Ill. Oct. 23, 2025), the Illinois...
No APA Deference for OPA Liability; Third-Party Admiralty Claims Trigger § 1292(a)(3): The First Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG

No APA Deference for OPA Liability; Third-Party Admiralty Claims Trigger § 1292(a)(3): The First Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG

Date: Oct 25, 2025
No APA Deference for OPA Liability; Third-Party Admiralty Claims Trigger § 1292(a)(3): The First Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG Court: United States Court of...
Superadded Psychological Torment Counts: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Boyd v. Hamm and the Future of Nitrogen Hypoxia Under the Eighth Amendment

Superadded Psychological Torment Counts: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Boyd v. Hamm and the Future of Nitrogen Hypoxia Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Superadded Psychological Torment Counts: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Boyd v. Hamm and the Future of Nitrogen Hypoxia Under the Eighth Amendment Case: Boyd v. Hamm, 607 U.S. ___ (2025), No. 25A457...
Harmless Overstatement of Supervised Release and Enforcement of Appeal Waivers in Anders Proceedings: United States v. Domingo Francisco‑Juan (7th Cir. 2025)

Harmless Overstatement of Supervised Release and Enforcement of Appeal Waivers in Anders Proceedings: United States v. Domingo Francisco‑Juan (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Harmless Overstatement of Supervised Release and Enforcement of Appeal Waivers in Anders Proceedings: United States v. Domingo Francisco‑Juan (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Domingo...
Concurrent Supervised Release Terms and Harmless Rule 11 Misadvisement in an Anders Appeal

Concurrent Supervised Release Terms and Harmless Rule 11 Misadvisement in an Anders Appeal

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Concurrent Supervised Release Terms and Harmless Rule 11 Misadvisement in an Anders Appeal Introduction In United States v. Domingo Francisco-Juan (Nos. 24-1594 & 24-1595), the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert