Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

restricting-general-jurisdiction:-second-circuit& Case Commentaries

Sixth Amendment Trial Errors Are Nonjurisdictional; Mandamus Will Not Lie to Vacate Convictions: Commentary on State ex rel. Johnson v. McNamara, 2025-Ohio-2891

Sixth Amendment Trial Errors Are Nonjurisdictional; Mandamus Will Not Lie to Vacate Convictions: Commentary on State ex rel. Johnson v. McNamara, 2025-Ohio-2891

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Sixth Amendment Trial Errors Are Nonjurisdictional; Mandamus Will Not Lie to Vacate Convictions: Commentary on State ex rel. Johnson v. McNamara, 2025-Ohio-2891 Introduction In State ex rel. Johnson...
Hansen v. Boise School District #1: Personal Property Injury as a Prerequisite to Takings Standing

Hansen v. Boise School District #1: Personal Property Injury as a Prerequisite to Takings Standing

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Hansen v. Boise School District #1 (Idaho 2025): Personal Property Injury as a Prerequisite to Takings Standing 1. Introduction In Hansen v. Boise School District #1, the Supreme Court of Idaho...
“The Boyer Confirmation” – Wyoming Re-Affirms that Dispatch-Derived License Information and a Single Observed Traffic Infraction Jointly Supply Reasonable Suspicion for a Stop

“The Boyer Confirmation” – Wyoming Re-Affirms that Dispatch-Derived License Information and a Single Observed Traffic Infraction Jointly Supply Reasonable Suspicion for a Stop

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“The Boyer Confirmation” – Wyoming Re-Affirms that Dispatch-Derived License Information and a Single Observed Traffic Infraction Jointly Supply Reasonable Suspicion for a Stop Introduction Andrew Lee...
Default, Progressive Discipline, and Revocation: The Kovac Decision’s Reinforcement of Wisconsin’s Lawyer-Regulation Framework

Default, Progressive Discipline, and Revocation: The Kovac Decision’s Reinforcement of Wisconsin’s Lawyer-Regulation Framework

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Default, Progressive Discipline, and Revocation: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. Kovac and the Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s Latest Guidance on Attorney Misconduct 1. Introduction In Office of...
Brown v. McMillon: Eleventh Circuit Rejects “Administrative Default Judgments by Acquiescence” and Clarifies Futility Standard for Pro Se Pleadings

Brown v. McMillon: Eleventh Circuit Rejects “Administrative Default Judgments by Acquiescence” and Clarifies Futility Standard for Pro Se Pleadings

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Brown v. McMillon: Eleventh Circuit Rejects “Administrative Default Judgments by Acquiescence” and Clarifies Futility Standard for Pro Se Pleadings Introduction In Mubbrika S. Brown & Alquddus Brown...
The Vail-Romero Doctrine: Abandonment of the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Challenge as a Complete Bar to Asylum Relief in the Eleventh Circuit

The Vail-Romero Doctrine: Abandonment of the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Challenge as a Complete Bar to Asylum Relief in the Eleventh Circuit

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The Vail-Romero Doctrine: Abandonment of the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Challenge as a Complete Bar to Asylum Relief in the Eleventh Circuit 1. Introduction Sandra Vail-Romero, a young indigenous woman...
United States v. Grindle: Mental-Health Challenges Do Not Automatically Vitiate Knowing & Voluntary Sentence-Appeal Waivers

United States v. Grindle: Mental-Health Challenges Do Not Automatically Vitiate Knowing & Voluntary Sentence-Appeal Waivers

Date: Aug 19, 2025
United States v. Grindle: Mental-Health Challenges Do Not Automatically Vitiate Knowing & Voluntary Sentence-Appeal Waivers Introduction United States v. Nicholas Grindle (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025)...
Reaffirming the Two-Prong Standard for Equitable Tolling in Immigration Motions to Reopen: Commentary on Allaeldin Elhattab v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the Two-Prong Standard for Equitable Tolling in Immigration Motions to Reopen: Commentary on Allaeldin Elhattab v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Reaffirming the Two-Prong Standard for Equitable Tolling in Immigration Motions to Reopen (Allaeldin Elhattab v. Attorney General, Third Circuit, 2025) 1. Introduction The United States Court of...
Third Circuit Clarifies That Beneficiaries of a Conflicted Tribunal Lack a § 1983 Due-Process Claim Absent Personal Prejudice

Third Circuit Clarifies That Beneficiaries of a Conflicted Tribunal Lack a § 1983 Due-Process Claim Absent Personal Prejudice

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Third Circuit Clarifies That Beneficiaries of a Conflicted Tribunal Lack a § 1983 Due-Process Claim Absent Personal Prejudice Introduction East Ohio Capital LLC (“East Ohio”) partnered with the...
Substantial-Evidence Review of Mixed Questions after Wilkinson – A Commentary on Jose Ramos Jimenez v. Attorney General, U.S.

Substantial-Evidence Review of Mixed Questions after Wilkinson – A Commentary on Jose Ramos Jimenez v. Attorney General, U.S.

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Substantial-Evidence Review of Mixed Questions after Wilkinson: A Comprehensive Commentary on Jose Ramos Jimenez v. Attorney General United States of America (3d Cir. Aug. 15 2025) 1. Introduction In...
Third Circuit Opens the Door to Judicial Review of “Good Moral Character” Findings in Cancellation-of-Removal Cases

Third Circuit Opens the Door to Judicial Review of “Good Moral Character” Findings in Cancellation-of-Removal Cases

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Third Circuit Opens the Door to Judicial Review of “Good Moral Character” Findings in Cancellation-of-Removal Cases Introduction Josue Roman Sanchez v. Attorney General marks a pivotal moment in U.S....
When Deliberate Indifference Also “Shocks the Conscience”: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification of Supervisory Liability in Doe v. Jewell

When Deliberate Indifference Also “Shocks the Conscience”: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification of Supervisory Liability in Doe v. Jewell

Date: Aug 19, 2025
When Deliberate Indifference Also “Shocks the Conscience”: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification of Supervisory Liability in Doe v. Jewell Introduction In Doe v. Jewell, the United States Court of...
From “Minor” to Material: Fifth Circuit Recalibrates the PLRA Physical-Injury Threshold in Morris v. Estes

From “Minor” to Material: Fifth Circuit Recalibrates the PLRA Physical-Injury Threshold in Morris v. Estes

Date: Aug 19, 2025
From “Minor” to Material: Fifth Circuit Recalibrates the PLRA Physical-Injury Threshold in Morris v. Estes 1. Introduction Background. In Morris v. Estes, No. 24-30553 (5th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025),...
Norman v. Ingle: Video-Clarity Rule & Officer-Specific Qualified Immunity Analysis in the Fifth Circuit

Norman v. Ingle: Video-Clarity Rule & Officer-Specific Qualified Immunity Analysis in the Fifth Circuit

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Norman v. Ingle: Video-Clarity Rule & Officer-Specific Qualified Immunity Analysis in the Fifth Circuit I. Introduction Norman v. Ingle, No. 24-20431 (5th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025), sets a new benchmark...

        Fifth Circuit Endorses “Non-Physical” Quorum: State of Texas v. Bondi and the
        Modernization of the Quorum Clause

Fifth Circuit Endorses “Non-Physical” Quorum: State of Texas v. Bondi and the Modernization of the Quorum Clause

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Fifth Circuit Endorses “Non-Physical” Quorum: State of Texas v. Bondi and the Modernization of the Quorum Clause 1. Introduction In State of Texas v. Bondi, No. 24-10386 (5th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025), the...
The Stelly Clarification: One-Year Prescriptive Period Governs § 1981 Failure-to-Promote Actions Involving “New and Distinct” Internal Promotions

The Stelly Clarification: One-Year Prescriptive Period Governs § 1981 Failure-to-Promote Actions Involving “New and Distinct” Internal Promotions

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The Stelly Clarification: One-Year Prescriptive Period Governs § 1981 Failure-to-Promote Actions Involving “New and Distinct” Internal Promotions 1. Introduction In Stelly v. Department of Public...
Plain-Error Limits on Borden-Based Challenges: Fifth Circuit Preserves Louisiana Armed Robbery as a “Crime of Violence” Absent Proven Reckless-Mens-Rea Applications

Plain-Error Limits on Borden-Based Challenges: Fifth Circuit Preserves Louisiana Armed Robbery as a “Crime of Violence” Absent Proven Reckless-Mens-Rea Applications

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Plain-Error Limits on Borden-Based Challenges: Fifth Circuit Preserves Louisiana Armed Robbery as a “Crime of Violence” Absent Proven Reckless-Mens-Rea Applications Introduction United States v....
The Business-Judgment Shield in Legal-Malpractice “Case-Within-a-Case” Analysis: Commentary on John Shufeldt v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.

The Business-Judgment Shield in Legal-Malpractice “Case-Within-a-Case” Analysis: Commentary on John Shufeldt v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The Business-Judgment Shield in Legal-Malpractice “Case-Within-a-Case” Analysis: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Causation Requirements in Shufeldt v. Baker Donelson 1. Introduction This commentary addresses...
Rule 32(h) Notice and Unconditional-Plea Waiver Clarified: In-Depth Commentary on United States v. Tyjuan Devon Gray (6th Cir. 2025)

Rule 32(h) Notice and Unconditional-Plea Waiver Clarified: In-Depth Commentary on United States v. Tyjuan Devon Gray (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Rule 32(h) Notice and Unconditional-Plea Waiver Clarified: Commentary on United States v. Tyjuan Devon Gray, Nos. 24-1507/1553/1577 (6th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025) I. Introduction The consolidated appeal in...
“Reasonable Notice” Redefined: The Sixth Circuit’s Flexible Approach to Rule 32(h) Upward Departures in United States v. Tyjuan Devon Gray

“Reasonable Notice” Redefined: The Sixth Circuit’s Flexible Approach to Rule 32(h) Upward Departures in United States v. Tyjuan Devon Gray

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Reasonable Notice” Redefined: The Sixth Circuit’s Flexible Approach to Rule 32(h) Upward Departures in United States v. Tyjuan Devon Gray Introduction On 15 August 2025, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert