Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

privileges-and-immunities-and-the-commerce-clause:-supreme-court& Case Commentaries

Animus Alone Is Not Enough: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Executive Land-Use Enforcement Must “Shock the Conscience” to Violate Substantive Due Process

Animus Alone Is Not Enough: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Executive Land-Use Enforcement Must “Shock the Conscience” to Violate Substantive Due Process

Date: Nov 3, 2025
Animus Alone Is Not Enough: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Executive Land-Use Enforcement Must “Shock the Conscience” to Violate Substantive Due Process Introduction In Codorun Farms Inc. v. West...
No Monell or Supervisory Liability Without a Predicate Constitutional Violation; Failure to Challenge an Independent Ground Forfeits the Appeal — Williams v. Luther (3d Cir. 2025)

No Monell or Supervisory Liability Without a Predicate Constitutional Violation; Failure to Challenge an Independent Ground Forfeits the Appeal — Williams v. Luther (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 3, 2025
No Monell or Supervisory Liability Without a Predicate Constitutional Violation; Failure to Challenge an Independent Ground Forfeits the Appeal — Williams v. Luther (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction This...
Prudential Ripeness for Permit-Cap Takings and Plat-Designated Greenbelts Outside Texas Strips-and-Gores: An In-Depth Commentary on Legacy Housing v. City of Horseshoe Bay (5th Cir. 2025)

Prudential Ripeness for Permit-Cap Takings and Plat-Designated Greenbelts Outside Texas Strips-and-Gores: An In-Depth Commentary on Legacy Housing v. City of Horseshoe Bay (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 3, 2025
Prudential Ripeness for Permit-Cap Takings and Plat-Designated Greenbelts Outside Texas Strips-and-Gores: Legacy Housing v. City of Horseshoe Bay Introduction In Legacy Housing Corporation v. City of...
No Standalone “Chilled-Speech” Claim: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Adverse-Action Requirement for First Amendment Employment Retaliation and Recognizes Pre‑Enforcement Standing for Alleged Unwritten Campus Speech Codes

No Standalone “Chilled-Speech” Claim: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Adverse-Action Requirement for First Amendment Employment Retaliation and Recognizes Pre‑Enforcement Standing for Alleged Unwritten Campus Speech Codes

Date: Nov 3, 2025
No Standalone “Chilled-Speech” Claim: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Adverse-Action Requirement for First Amendment Employment Retaliation and Recognizes Pre‑Enforcement Standing for Alleged Unwritten...
No Civil Conspiracy Without an Independently Actionable Predicate; Interference with Parental Rights Requires Actual Removal from Custody

No Civil Conspiracy Without an Independently Actionable Predicate; Interference with Parental Rights Requires Actual Removal from Custody

Date: Nov 3, 2025
No Civil Conspiracy Without an Independently Actionable Predicate; Interference with Parental Rights Requires Actual Removal from Custody Case: Amy Kissinger-Stankevitz v. Town of Tappahannock, et...
Fourth Circuit Holds that a Principal Officer’s Ratification Cures Appointments Clause Defects in Rulemaking and Is Not Impermissibly Retroactive

Fourth Circuit Holds that a Principal Officer’s Ratification Cures Appointments Clause Defects in Rulemaking and Is Not Impermissibly Retroactive

Date: Nov 3, 2025
Fourth Circuit Holds that a Principal Officer’s Ratification Cures Appointments Clause Defects in Rulemaking and Is Not Impermissibly Retroactive Case: Eliza Wille v. Howard Lutnik (and related...
No More Boilerplate: Fourth Circuit Requires Meaningful Engagement with Country‑Conditions Evidence in Gender‑Based Asylum and CAT Claims

No More Boilerplate: Fourth Circuit Requires Meaningful Engagement with Country‑Conditions Evidence in Gender‑Based Asylum and CAT Claims

Date: Nov 3, 2025
No More Boilerplate: Fourth Circuit Requires Meaningful Engagement with Country‑Conditions Evidence in Gender‑Based Asylum and CAT Claims Introduction In Reyna Alfaro‑Zelaya v. Bondi, the Fourth...
United States v. Cuellar: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Co‑Conspirator Drug Quantity Attribution and the Presumption of Reasonableness for Below‑Guidelines Sentences

United States v. Cuellar: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Co‑Conspirator Drug Quantity Attribution and the Presumption of Reasonableness for Below‑Guidelines Sentences

Date: Nov 3, 2025
United States v. Cuellar: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Co‑Conspirator Drug Quantity Attribution and the Presumption of Reasonableness for Below‑Guidelines Sentences Court: United States Court of Appeals...
Imputed Political Opinion Must Be Squarely Addressed; Unreasonable Arrest‑Warrant Corroboration Rejected in Asylum Cases — Commentary on Lin v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Imputed Political Opinion Must Be Squarely Addressed; Unreasonable Arrest‑Warrant Corroboration Rejected in Asylum Cases — Commentary on Lin v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Imputed Political Opinion Must Be Squarely Addressed; Unreasonable Arrest‑Warrant Corroboration Rejected in Asylum Cases — Commentary on Lin v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) Case: Lin v. Bondi, No. 22-6532...
Gross Violation as a Prerequisite to Extended-Eligibility Compensatory Education: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Perez v. Banks

Gross Violation as a Prerequisite to Extended-Eligibility Compensatory Education: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Perez v. Banks

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Gross Violation as a Prerequisite to Extended-Eligibility Compensatory Education: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Perez v. Banks Introduction In a non-precedential Summary Order, the United...
Eleventh Circuit: Mental Illness Does Not Preclude an Upward Variance for Deterrence and Public Protection; Mere Reference to Pending State Charges Is Not Procedural Error When Disclaimed

Eleventh Circuit: Mental Illness Does Not Preclude an Upward Variance for Deterrence and Public Protection; Mere Reference to Pending State Charges Is Not Procedural Error When Disclaimed

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Mental Illness Does Not Preclude an Upward Variance for Deterrence and Public Protection; Mere Reference to Pending State Charges Is Not Procedural Error When Disclaimed Case:...
In the “Twilight” Between Passive and Active Resistance: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Qualified Immunity for Taser Use During Vehicle Extraction Where Officer Suspects a Weapon

In the “Twilight” Between Passive and Active Resistance: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Qualified Immunity for Taser Use During Vehicle Extraction Where Officer Suspects a Weapon

Date: Nov 2, 2025
In the “Twilight” Between Passive and Active Resistance: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Qualified Immunity for Taser Use During Vehicle Extraction Where Officer Suspects a Weapon Introduction This Sixth...
“Some Harm,” Not “Unreasonable Interference”: Sixth Circuit Extends McNeal/Muldrow Hostile-Work-Environment Standard to ADA Claims and Clarifies Limits of Remote-Work Accommodations Where Onsite Essential Functions Exist

“Some Harm,” Not “Unreasonable Interference”: Sixth Circuit Extends McNeal/Muldrow Hostile-Work-Environment Standard to ADA Claims and Clarifies Limits of Remote-Work Accommodations Where Onsite Essential Functions Exist

Date: Nov 2, 2025
“Some Harm,” Not “Unreasonable Interference”: Sixth Circuit Extends McNeal/Muldrow Hostile-Work-Environment Standard to ADA Claims and Clarifies Limits of Remote-Work Accommodations Where Onsite...
Translation Services Qualify as “Material Support” Under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B: The Sixth Circuit’s Published Holding in United States v. Carpenter

Translation Services Qualify as “Material Support” Under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B: The Sixth Circuit’s Published Holding in United States v. Carpenter

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Translation Services Qualify as “Material Support” Under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B: The Sixth Circuit’s Published Holding in United States v. Carpenter Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
No Automatic Right to a Fed Master Account: Tenth Circuit Confirms Reserve Bank Discretion and Limits APA Review in Custodia Bank v. FRBKC

No Automatic Right to a Fed Master Account: Tenth Circuit Confirms Reserve Bank Discretion and Limits APA Review in Custodia Bank v. FRBKC

Date: Nov 2, 2025
No Automatic Right to a Fed Master Account: Tenth Circuit Confirms Reserve Bank Discretion and Limits APA Review Introduction In a closely watched dispute at the intersection of payments...
COA Requires Developed, Issue-Specific Argument; Prosecutorial “Vouching” Not Clearly Established as a Standalone Due Process Violation under AEDPA — Revilla v. Harpe (10th Cir. 2025)

COA Requires Developed, Issue-Specific Argument; Prosecutorial “Vouching” Not Clearly Established as a Standalone Due Process Violation under AEDPA — Revilla v. Harpe (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
COA Requires Developed, Issue-Specific Argument; Prosecutorial “Vouching” Not Clearly Established as a Standalone Due Process Violation under AEDPA — Revilla v. Harpe (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In...
Direct Control of a Known-Contents Container Equals Actual Possession; Broad Discretion to Give Anti-CSI Instructions: Commentary on United States v. Eddings (10th Cir. 2025)

Direct Control of a Known-Contents Container Equals Actual Possession; Broad Discretion to Give Anti-CSI Instructions: Commentary on United States v. Eddings (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Direct Control of a Known-Contents Container Equals Actual Possession; Broad Discretion to Give Anti-CSI Instructions: Commentary on United States v. Eddings (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction United...
Prior Downward Variance as a § 3553(a) “Backdrop”: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Despite Plausible Family-Circumstances Showing

Prior Downward Variance as a § 3553(a) “Backdrop”: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Despite Plausible Family-Circumstances Showing

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Prior Downward Variance as a § 3553(a) “Backdrop”: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Despite Plausible Family-Circumstances Showing Case: United States v. Fraser,...
No Anti‑SLAPP Shield for Private‑Employer Contacts Without a Plausible Nexus to Government Proceedings: The First Circuit’s Post‑Bristol Application in Blakesley v. Marcus

No Anti‑SLAPP Shield for Private‑Employer Contacts Without a Plausible Nexus to Government Proceedings: The First Circuit’s Post‑Bristol Application in Blakesley v. Marcus

Date: Nov 2, 2025
No Anti‑SLAPP Shield for Private‑Employer Contacts Without a Plausible Nexus to Government Proceedings: The First Circuit’s Post‑Bristol Application in Blakesley v. Marcus Introduction In Blakesley...
No Collateral Attack on the JPML Lottery: Filing of the Administrative Record Fixes Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)

No Collateral Attack on the JPML Lottery: Filing of the Administrative Record Fixes Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
No Collateral Attack on the JPML Lottery: Filing of the Administrative Record Fixes Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Introduction In Direct Action for Rights and Equality v. FCC, a consolidated set of...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert