Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-combination-jury-instructions-in-murder-conviction-upholds-kentucky& Case Commentaries

United States v. Griffin: Heightened Appellate Deference to District-Court Credibility Findings in § 2255 Ineffective-Assistance Hearings

United States v. Griffin: Heightened Appellate Deference to District-Court Credibility Findings in § 2255 Ineffective-Assistance Hearings

Date: Jun 25, 2025
United States v. Griffin: Heightened Appellate Deference to District-Court Credibility Findings in § 2255 Ineffective-Assistance Hearings 1. Introduction United States v. Griffin, No. 22-60453 (5th...
“Chinnery v. Kaiser” – The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms the Minimal Pleading Standard for Sincerity in Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims

“Chinnery v. Kaiser” – The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms the Minimal Pleading Standard for Sincerity in Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Chinnery v. Kaiser: The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms the Minimal Pleading Standard for Sincerity in Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims Introduction The unpublished opinion in Naisha Chinnery v....
United States v. Adams: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms the “Central Thesis” Standard for Sentencing Explanations

United States v. Adams: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms the “Central Thesis” Standard for Sentencing Explanations

Date: Jun 25, 2025
United States v. Adams: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms the “Central Thesis” Standard for Sentencing Explanations Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished decision in United States v. Maurice Adams...
United States v. Yelizarov: Narrowing the “Miscarriage-of-Justice” Escape Hatch to Appellate-Waiver Clauses After a § 924(c) Vacatur

United States v. Yelizarov: Narrowing the “Miscarriage-of-Justice” Escape Hatch to Appellate-Waiver Clauses After a § 924(c) Vacatur

Date: Jun 25, 2025
United States v. Yelizarov: Narrowing the “Miscarriage-of-Justice” Escape Hatch to Appellate-Waiver Clauses After a § 924(c) Vacatur Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published decision in United...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Enforceability of Appeal-Waivers after § 924(c) Vacatur: A Commentary on United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov (2025)

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Enforceability of Appeal-Waivers after § 924(c) Vacatur: A Commentary on United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov (2025)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Enforceability of Appeal-Waivers after § 924(c) Vacatur: A Commentary on United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov (2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov,...
Biers v. Dentons US: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appealability of Interlocutory Orders and Reinforces Limits on Stand-Alone Cross-Claims

Biers v. Dentons US: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appealability of Interlocutory Orders and Reinforces Limits on Stand-Alone Cross-Claims

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Biers v. Dentons US: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appealability of Interlocutory Orders and Reinforces Limits on Stand-Alone Cross-Claims Introduction In Biers v. Dentons US LLP, the United States Court...
Teetz v. Stepien: The Tenth Circuit Brands Prolonged Prone Restraint of a Subdued Detainee as “Deadly Force”

Teetz v. Stepien: The Tenth Circuit Brands Prolonged Prone Restraint of a Subdued Detainee as “Deadly Force”

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Teetz v. Stepien: The Tenth Circuit Brands Prolonged Prone Restraint of a Subdued Detainee as “Deadly Force” Introduction In Teetz v. Stepien, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Always Compare the Defendant to Actual Participants: Berryhill’s Clarification of § 3B1.2 Mitigating-Role Analysis

Always Compare the Defendant to Actual Participants: Berryhill’s Clarification of § 3B1.2 Mitigating-Role Analysis

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Always Compare the Defendant to Actual Participants: United States v. Berryhill and the Clarified Duty to Perform a Relative-Culpability Analysis Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 Introduction United States v....

        United States v. Roark: Tenth Circuit Clarifies (1) When Failure to Give a Specific-Unanimity Instruction Constitutes Reversible Plain Error and 
        (2) A District Court’s Power to Vacate Its Own Erroneous Rule 29 Acquittal Without Offending Double Jeopardy

United States v. Roark: Tenth Circuit Clarifies (1) When Failure to Give a Specific-Unanimity Instruction Constitutes Reversible Plain Error and (2) A District Court’s Power to Vacate Its Own Erroneous Rule 29 Acquittal Without Offending Double Jeopardy

Date: Jun 25, 2025
United States v. Roark: Tenth Circuit Clarifies (1) When Failure to Give a Specific-Unanimity Instruction Constitutes Reversible Plain Error and (2) A District Court’s Power to Vacate Its Own...
Dismissal without Prejudice for Corporate Suspension Does Not Constitute “Favorable Termination” in Malicious-Prosecution Actions – A Commentary on Wyles v. Sussman (10th Cir. 2025)

Dismissal without Prejudice for Corporate Suspension Does Not Constitute “Favorable Termination” in Malicious-Prosecution Actions – A Commentary on Wyles v. Sussman (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Dismissal without Prejudice for Corporate Suspension Does Not Constitute “Favorable Termination” in Malicious-Prosecution Actions A Comprehensive Commentary on Wyles v. Sussman, 10th Cir., 23 June...
“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained:  A Commentary on Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ, 2025 WI 25

“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained: A Commentary on Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ, 2025 WI 25

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Continuing Debate in Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice, 2025 WI 25 1. Introduction The...
“Speculation Is Not a Fact” – The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Due-Process Limits on Victim-Impact Statements in State v. C. Jacob

“Speculation Is Not a Fact” – The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Due-Process Limits on Victim-Impact Statements in State v. C. Jacob

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Speculation Is Not a Fact” – The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Due-Process Limits on Victim-Impact Statements in State v. C. Jacob I. Introduction On 24 June 2025, the Supreme Court of...
Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals:  Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ

Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals: Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals: Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice Introduction In Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice, 2025 WI 25, the Wisconsin...
“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (2025)

“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (2025)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (Conn. 2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Connecticut, in State v. Hinton,...
State v. Matthews: Re-defining the Weight of Officer Testimony versus Dash-Cam Evidence in Particularized Suspicion Analysis

State v. Matthews: Re-defining the Weight of Officer Testimony versus Dash-Cam Evidence in Particularized Suspicion Analysis

Date: Jun 25, 2025
State v. Matthews: Re-defining the Weight of Officer Testimony versus Dash-Cam Evidence in Particularized Suspicion Analysis Introduction State v. T. Matthews, 2025 MT 129, presented the Montana...
“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24

“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision in Nicole...
Waiver-by-Mootness:  The Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction After Insurer’s Post-Payment “Reservation of Rights”  (Commentary on Perea v. AmTrust Ins., 2025 MT 130)

Waiver-by-Mootness: The Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction After Insurer’s Post-Payment “Reservation of Rights” (Commentary on Perea v. AmTrust Ins., 2025 MT 130)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Waiver-by-Mootness: The Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction After Insurer’s Post-Payment “Reservation of Rights” Commentary on Perea v. AmTrust Insurance Co., 2025 MT 130 Introduction Perea...
“No Live Case, No Power to Hear”:  Hawkins v. State (2025) and the Jurisdictional Pre-Condition for Interlocutory Appeals from the Montana Tax Appeal Board

“No Live Case, No Power to Hear”: Hawkins v. State (2025) and the Jurisdictional Pre-Condition for Interlocutory Appeals from the Montana Tax Appeal Board

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“No Live Case, No Power to Hear”: Hawkins v. State, 2025 MT 134 — Cementing the Rule that District Court Interlocutory Jurisdiction under § 15-2-305, MCA, Requires an Active MTAB Proceeding...
Expanding the “Position of Trust”: Pearson v. State Affirms Volunteer Fire-Service Officers as Authorities under 11 Del. C. § 761(e)(2)

Expanding the “Position of Trust”: Pearson v. State Affirms Volunteer Fire-Service Officers as Authorities under 11 Del. C. § 761(e)(2)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Expanding the “Position of Trust”: Pearson v. State Affirms Volunteer Fire-Service Officers as Authorities under 11 Del. C. § 761(e)(2) Introduction Pearson v. State, No. 268, 2024 (Del. June 24,...
The “Reasonable-Basis & Distinctiveness” Doctrine: Idaho Supreme Court Re-defines Fiscal Impact Statements and Ballot Title Duties in Idahoans United for Women and Families v. Labrador

The “Reasonable-Basis & Distinctiveness” Doctrine: Idaho Supreme Court Re-defines Fiscal Impact Statements and Ballot Title Duties in Idahoans United for Women and Families v. Labrador

Date: Jun 25, 2025
The “Reasonable-Basis & Distinctiveness” Doctrine: Idaho Supreme Court Re-defines Fiscal Impact Statements and Ballot Title Duties in Idahoans United for Women and Families v. Labrador (2025) 1....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert