Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-&amp Case Commentaries

Schools Within Parks Sustain Firearm Bans on Facial Review; Signage-Based Enforcement Defeats Pre‑Enforcement Standing — A Structured Commentary on LaFave v. County of Fairfax (4th Cir. 2025)

Schools Within Parks Sustain Firearm Bans on Facial Review; Signage-Based Enforcement Defeats Pre‑Enforcement Standing — A Structured Commentary on LaFave v. County of Fairfax (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Schools Within Parks Sustain Firearm Bans on Facial Review; Signage-Based Enforcement Defeats Pre‑Enforcement Standing — A Structured Commentary on LaFave v. County of Fairfax (4th Cir. 2025)...
Title VII’s 90‑Day Rule Stays in Its Lane: Fourth Circuit Bars Relation‑Back for Discrete Acts and Rejects Cross‑Statute Procedural Borrowing in Hollis v. Morgan State University

Title VII’s 90‑Day Rule Stays in Its Lane: Fourth Circuit Bars Relation‑Back for Discrete Acts and Rejects Cross‑Statute Procedural Borrowing in Hollis v. Morgan State University

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Title VII’s 90‑Day Rule Stays in Its Lane: Fourth Circuit Bars Relation‑Back for Discrete Acts and Rejects Cross‑Statute Procedural Borrowing Comprehensive Commentary on Hollis v. Morgan State...
Discretion Required: Fourth Circuit Holds South Carolina’s Quasi‑Judicial Administrative Immunity Applies Only to Discretionary Acts

Discretion Required: Fourth Circuit Holds South Carolina’s Quasi‑Judicial Administrative Immunity Applies Only to Discretionary Acts

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Discretion Required: Fourth Circuit Holds South Carolina’s Quasi‑Judicial Administrative Immunity Applies Only to Discretionary Acts Commentary on Tim Landholt v. Kendall Corley & Jeanette McBride,...
Nonbypassable Transmission Riders Under R.C. 4928.05: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms PUCO’s Discretion and Demands Particularized Harm for Discovery Challenges

Nonbypassable Transmission Riders Under R.C. 4928.05: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms PUCO’s Discretion and Demands Particularized Harm for Discovery Challenges

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Nonbypassable Transmission Riders Under R.C. 4928.05: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms PUCO’s Discretion and Demands Particularized Harm for Discovery Challenges Introduction In In re Application of Ohio...
Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole Case: Alana M. (Mother) v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of...
No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties — Commentary on Wallace v. O’Hara (Alaska 2025)

No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties — Commentary on Wallace v. O’Hara (Alaska 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties Case: Amye Wallace v. John O’Hara, Supreme Court of the State of Alaska, No. S-19241...
No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS Memorandum...
Riverside Reaffirmed: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Bench-Trier May Resolve Conflicting Inferences at Summary Judgment; No “Rent Substitution” Credit for Affiliate-Funded Construction Absent Proof

Riverside Reaffirmed: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Bench-Trier May Resolve Conflicting Inferences at Summary Judgment; No “Rent Substitution” Credit for Affiliate-Funded Construction Absent Proof

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Riverside Reaffirmed: Bench-Trier Summary Judgment and the Limits of “Rent Substitution” under a Triple‑Net Lease Introduction In Erie Properties, LLC v. Global Growth Holdings, Inc., the Idaho...
Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming

Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming Introduction In In the Interest of MC, Minor Child:...
State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt Judicial Intervention

State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt Judicial Intervention

Date: Aug 31, 2025
State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt...
Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence”

Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence”

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence” Court: U.S. Court...
Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity

Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity Case: Leise v....
Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos

Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Summary Order) Date: August...
When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims

When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second...
O’Neill v. Deml: Second Circuit Holds No Duty to Warn Pro Se § 2254 Petitioners About Mixed Petitions, Stays, or AEDPA Deadlines

O’Neill v. Deml: Second Circuit Holds No Duty to Warn Pro Se § 2254 Petitioners About Mixed Petitions, Stays, or AEDPA Deadlines

Date: Aug 31, 2025
O’Neill v. Deml: Second Circuit Holds No Duty to Warn Pro Se § 2254 Petitioners About Mixed Petitions, Stays, or AEDPA Deadlines Introduction In O’Neill v. Deml, No. 23-620 (2d Cir. Aug. 27, 2025),...
After Egbert, DHS’s § 287.10 Grievance Scheme Forecloses Bivens Claims Against HSI Agents; Fabrication‑Based False Arrest Presents a New Bivens Context in the Second Circuit

After Egbert, DHS’s § 287.10 Grievance Scheme Forecloses Bivens Claims Against HSI Agents; Fabrication‑Based False Arrest Presents a New Bivens Context in the Second Circuit

Date: Aug 31, 2025
After Egbert, DHS’s § 287.10 Grievance Scheme Forecloses Bivens Claims Against HSI Agents; Fabrication‑Based False Arrest Presents a New Bivens Context in the Second Circuit Introduction In...
Schnabel Goes Offline: Later‑Sent, Unflagged Arbitration Clauses in Mailed “Welcome Packages” Do Not Bind Absent Clear Notice and Assent

Schnabel Goes Offline: Later‑Sent, Unflagged Arbitration Clauses in Mailed “Welcome Packages” Do Not Bind Absent Clear Notice and Assent

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Schnabel Goes Offline: Later‑Sent, Unflagged Arbitration Clauses in Mailed “Welcome Packages” Do Not Bind Absent Clear Notice and Assent Introduction In Sudakow v. CleanChoice Energy, Inc., the...
Depraved‑Mind Attempted Murder Qualifies as a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines: United States v. Delgado (2d Cir. 2025)

Depraved‑Mind Attempted Murder Qualifies as a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines: United States v. Delgado (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Depraved‑Mind Attempted Murder Qualifies as a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines: United States v. Delgado (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Delgado is a precedential Second Circuit...
CDIU Reports as Reliable Hearsay and a Basis to Discount Medical Opinions under Post‑2017 SSA Rules: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies in Gonzalez Castillo v. Commissioner

CDIU Reports as Reliable Hearsay and a Basis to Discount Medical Opinions under Post‑2017 SSA Rules: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies in Gonzalez Castillo v. Commissioner

Date: Aug 31, 2025
CDIU Reports as Reliable Hearsay and a Basis to Discount Medical Opinions under Post‑2017 SSA Rules Commentary on: Marta Gonzalez Castillo v. Commissioner of Social Security (11th Cir. Aug. 27, 2025)...
Unchallenged Vocational Expert Testimony Suffices at Step Five; No Sua Sponte Duty to Verify Job Numbers: Eleventh Circuit in Screen v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security

Unchallenged Vocational Expert Testimony Suffices at Step Five; No Sua Sponte Duty to Verify Job Numbers: Eleventh Circuit in Screen v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Unchallenged Vocational Expert Testimony Suffices at Step Five; No Sua Sponte Duty to Verify Job Numbers: Eleventh Circuit in Screen v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security Court: U.S. Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert