39[(1) When there is a reason to believe that a forest offence has been committed in respect of any forest produce, such produce together with all tools, arms, boats, carts, equipment, ropes, chains, machines, vehicles, cattle or any other article used in committing any such offence may be seized by an Forest Officer or Police Officer.
(2) Any officer seizing any property under this section shall place on such property a mark indicating that the same has been so seized and shall, as soon as may be, make a report of such seizure before an officer not below the rank of the Divisional Forest Officer (hereinafter referred to as authorised officer ):
Provided that when the forest produce with respect to which such offence is believed to have been committed is the property of the Government and the offender is unknown, it shall be sufficient if the officer makes, as soon as may be, a report of the circumstances to his official superior.
(3) Subject to sub-section (5), where the authorised officer upon receipt of report about seizure, is satisfied that a forest offence has been committed in respect thereof, he may, by order in writing and for reasons to be recorded, confiscate forest produce so seized together with all tools, arms, boats, carts, equipment, ropes, chains, machines, vehicles or any other articles used in committing such offence. Copy of the order of confiscation shall be forwarded without any undue delay to the person from whom the property is seized and to the Conservator of Forest Circle in which the timber or forest produce, as the case may be, has been seized.
(4) No order confiscating any property shall be made under sub-section (3) unless the Authorised Officer,
(a) sends an intimation in writing about the proceedings for confiscation of the property to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account of which the seizure has been made but no order to be passed;
(b) issue a notice in writing to the person from whom the property is seized and to any other person who may appear to the authorised officer to have some interest in such property;
(c) gives to the officer effecting the seizure and the person or persons to whom notice issued under clause (b) a hearing on date to be fixed for such purpose.
(5) No order of confiscation under sub-section (3) of any tools, arms, boats, carts, equipment, ropes, chains, machines, vehicles or any other article (other than timber or forest produce seized) shall be made if any person referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (4) proves to the satisfaction of authorised officer that any such tools, arms, boats, carts, equipment, ropes, chains, machines, vehicles, cattle or any other articles were used without his knowledge or connivance or, as the case may be, without the knowledge or connivance of his servant or agent and that all reasonable and necessary precautions had been taken against the use of objects aforesaid or commission of forest offence.
(6) Where the cattle are involved in the commission of a forest offence, the same after seizure by any officer, as the case may be, shall be entrusted to any responsible person under a proper receipt on an undertaking to produce the same when required in case there is no cattle pound within a radius of five kilometers from the place of such offence:
Provided that notwithstanding anything contained in section 30, in case of unclaimed cattle a Forest Officer not below the rank of Range Officer, after giving sufficient publicity in the vicinity of the place of offence for the owner to come forward to claim the cattle within seven days from the date when such publicity has been given, may dispose them of by public auction. The provisions of the Cattle Trespass Act, Samvat 1977, shall apply in respect of the charges to be levied for the upkeep and fee of the cattle].
40[26-A. Power of search and seizure. Any Forest Officer 41[not below the rank of] 42[Range officer], having reasonable grounds to believe that forest produce is, in contravention of the provisions of this Act, in the possession of a person in any place, may enter such place with the object of carrying out a search for the forest produce and its confiscation:
Provided that such search shall not be conducted otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.]
43[26-B. Revision before Court of Sessions against order of confiscation. (1) Any party aggrieved by an order of confiscation under 44[section 26] may within thirty days of the order or if facts of the confiscation have not been communicated to him, within thirty days of knowledge of such order submit a petition for revision to the Court of Sessions Division whereof the headquarters of Authorised Officer are situated.
Explanation I. In computing the period of thirty days under the sub-section, the time requiste for obtaining certified copy of the order of Authorised Officer shall be excluded.
Explanation II. For the purposes of this sub-section a party shall be deemed to have knowledge of the order of confiscation under 44[section 26] on publication of such order in two daily newspapers having circulation in the State.
(2) The Court of Sessions may confirm, reverse or modify any final order of consequential nature passed by the Authorised Officer.
(3) Copies of the order passed in revision shall be sent to the Authorised Officer for compliance or passing such further order or for taking such further orders or for taking such further action as may be directed by such court.
(4) For entertaining, hearing and deciding a revision under this section, the Court of Sessions shall, as far as may be, exercise the same powers and follow the same procedure as it exercises and follows while entertaining, hearing and deciding a revision under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Samvat 1989.
(5) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, Samvat 1989, the order of Court of Session passed under this Section shall be final and shall not be called in question before any Court.
26-C. Bar to jurisdiction of Court etc. under certain circumstances. (1) On receipt of report under sub-section (4) of Section 26 about intimation of proceedings for confiscation of property by the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account of which the seizure of property which is subject matter of confiscation, has been made, no court, Tribunal or Authority other than Authorised Officer and Court of Sessions referred to in Section 26 and 26-B shall have jurisdiction to make orders with regard to possession, delivery, disposal or distribution of the property in regard to which proceedings for confiscation are initiated under section 26, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained on this Act, or any other law for the time being in force.
Explanation. Where under any law for the time being in force, two or more courts have jurisdiction to try the forest offences, then receipt of intimation under sub-section (4) of section 26 by one of the Courts shall operate as Bar to exercise jurisdiction on all such other courts.
(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall effect the power saved under section 34 of the Act.
26-D. Penalty for forcibly opposing seizure. Any person who opposes the seizure of tools, arms, boats, carts, equipment, ropes, chains, machines, vehicles or cattle liable to be seized under this Act or forcibly receives the same after seizure shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years but shall not be less than three months and with fine which may extend to six thousand rupees but shall not be less than one thousand rupees.
26-E. Power to keep property seized on Sapurdnama. Any officer, who or whose subordinate has seized any tools, boats, carts, arms, vehicles, ma-chines, equipment, implements, chains, ropes or cattle or any other articles used in committing any forest offence, including the forest produce, under section 26, may keep the same on the Sapurdnama of a respectable person on the execution of a bond thereof, by such person, for the production of the property so kept on Sapurdnama if and when required by the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence or before the authorised officer empowered under sub-section (2) of section 26, on account of which the seizure has been made.]